Skip to content
Compare Metz vs Seraing

Metz vs Seraing Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Metz vs Seraing: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Metz Metz Home Team
Seraing Seraing Away Team
Metz
46.7
W W W D L L D L L D

Last 10 Matches

Seraing
23.1
L L L L D

Performance Radar

Metz
Seraing

Categories Won

12

Metz

3

Draw

0

Seraing

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

0%

0W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

0.4

2 / 5 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.4

12 / 5 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

-10

-10

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

1 / 5 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

3 / 5 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

2 / 5 matches

Top Scorer
G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)
N/A (0 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 17
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 73.7, Opponent Quality: 56.9

47.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.15

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.15

0.48

Actual: 0.4 | Diff: -0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
46.7

Attack: 66.3, Defense: 39.8, Form: 29.8

23.1

Attack: 13.0, Defense: 19.5, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

1

31-45'

4

46-60'

61-75'

1

76-90+'

Metz
Seraing
Metz

Power Rating Breakdown

46.7

Overall

Attack 66.3
Defense 39.8
Form 29.8
Consistency 53.2
Seraing

Power Rating Breakdown

23.1

Overall

Attack 13.0
Defense 19.5
Form 0.0
Consistency 95.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

73.7 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

56.9 vs 49.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Metz logo Metz
W
Fortuna (32%)
W
Sochaux (47%)
W
Seraing (33%)
D
Nice (75%)
L
Lorient (63%)
L
Monaco (62%)
D
Le Havre (66%)
L
Paris FC (74%)
Seraing logo Seraing
L
Standard (52%)
L
Charleroi (58%)
L
Feignies (44%)
L
Metz (50%)
D
MVV (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fortuna H
3 - 1 W
32%
Sochaux H
4 - 1 W
47%
Seraing H
6 - 0 W
33%
Nice A
0 - 0 D
75%
Lorient H
0 - 4 L
63%
Monaco H
1 - 2 L
62%
Le Havre A
4 - 4 D
66%
Paris FC H
1 - 3 L
74%
Marseille A
1 - 3 L
64%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Standard A
1 - 2 L
52%
Charleroi A
1 - 2 L
58%
Feignies A
0 - 2 L
44%
Metz A
0 - 6 L
50%
MVV H
0 - 0 D
43%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.4 vs 47.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Metz possess a formidable attacking unit, with G. Kvilitaia accounting for 2 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.0 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Metz has the defensive edge, conceding 1.8 per match compared to Seraing's 2.4.

Seraing has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Seraing is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Metz is on the rise with 3W in last 10, while Seraing shows signs of decline with 0W in last 5.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Metz faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If Seraing can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 23.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Metz. In practical terms, Metz would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Metz holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 46.7 against 23.1 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-17), Metz prevailed 6-0 against Seraing. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Metz secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 6-0 scoreline was emphatic — Metz completely dominated Seraing in that encounter, raising serious questions about Seraing's ability to compete at this level. Seraing will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Metz will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Metz

Metz

VS
Seraing

Seraing

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Metz

3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 18 conceded

Seraing

0W 1D 4L · 2 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or