Skip to content
Compare NEOM vs Ettifaq

NEOM vs Ettifaq Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NEOM vs Ettifaq: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NEOM NEOM Home Team
Ettifaq Ettifaq Away Team
NEOM
38.7
W L D D L W D D L W

Last 10 Matches

Ettifaq
46.2
L D D L W D W L L W

Performance Radar

NEOM
Ettifaq

Categories Won

3

NEOM

4

Draw

8

Ettifaq

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Benrahma (5 goals)
M. Dembélé (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
29%

2W / 7 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.6

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.4

48.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

1.65

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 35.0, Defense: 46.7, Form: 26.3

46.2

Attack: 59.3, Defense: 46.1, Form: 29.6

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

3

61-75'

4
2

76-90+'

2
NEOM
Ettifaq
NEOM

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 35.0
Defense 46.7
Form 26.3
Consistency 57.7
Ettifaq

Power Rating Breakdown

46.2

Overall

Attack 59.3
Defense 46.1
Form 29.6
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

51.4 vs 48.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NEOM logo NEOM
W
Pirates (63%)
L
Granada (50%)
D
Peterborough (42%)
D
Ettifaq (45%)
L
Hilal (73%)
W
Shabab (42%)
D
Fateh (43%)
D
Hazem (45%)
Ettifaq logo Ettifaq
L
Eldense (42%)
D
York (54%)
D
NEOM (50%)
L
Ittihad (52%)
W
Khaleej (37%)
D
Najma (33%)
W
Okhdood (34%)
L
Nassr (67%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pirates A
1 - 0 W
63%
Granada A
0 - 2 L
50%
Peterborough A
0 - 0 D
42%
Ettifaq H
1 - 1 D
45%
Hilal A
0 - 2 L
73%
Shabab H
2 - 1 W
42%
Fateh A
2 - 2 D
43%
Hazem H
1 - 1 D
45%
Najma A
1 - 2 L
46%
Ittihad A
4 - 3 W
65%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Eldense A
1 - 3 L
42%
York A
2 - 2 D
54%
NEOM A
1 - 1 D
50%
Ittihad H
1 - 3 L
52%
Khaleej A
5 - 0 W
37%
Najma H
0 - 0 D
33%
Okhdood A
3 - 1 W
34%
Nassr A
0 - 1 L
67%
Riyadh H
2 - 3 L
54%
Qadsiah H
3 - 2 W
64%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Ettifaq has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 48.8 against considerably stronger competition than NEOM (SoS: 37.6). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

Ettifaq leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to NEOM's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, NEOM and Ettifaq are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.

Ettifaq has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Ettifaq faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If NEOM can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 69% win probability for Ettifaq. In practical terms, Ettifaq would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Ettifaq holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 7.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Saudi Pro League (2026-05-21). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NEOM

NEOM

VS
Ettifaq

Ettifaq

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

NEOM

3W 4D 3L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded

Ettifaq

3W 3D 4L · 18 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or