Skip to content
Compare OHL vs Standard

OHL vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare OHL vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

OHL OHL Home Team
Standard Standard Away Team
OHL
39.7
D L W L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Standard
46.2
W L L L W D W W D L

Performance Radar

OHL
Standard

Categories Won

5

OHL

3

Draw

7

Standard

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Traoré (2 goals)
R. Saïd (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.9

46.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.76

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.06

1.12

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.18

Adjusted Power Rating
39.7

Attack: 55.1, Defense: 32.4, Form: 19.5

46.2

Attack: 41.9, Defense: 61.2, Form: 38.6

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

2

61-75'

2

76-90+'

2
OHL
Standard
OHL

Power Rating Breakdown

39.7

Overall

Attack 55.1
Defense 32.4
Form 19.5
Consistency 61.3
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

46.2

Overall

Attack 41.9
Defense 61.2
Form 38.6
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

48.9 vs 47.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
OHL logo OHL
D
Heerenveen (54%)
L
Club NXT (49%)
W
Lommel (40%)
L
Genk (45%)
D
Charleroi (58%)
W
Antwerp (52%)
L
Standard (52%)
D
Westerlo (45%)
Standard logo Standard
W
Seraing (33%)
L
Juventus (55%)
L
Dunkerque (47%)
L
Charleroi (54%)
W
Westerlo (45%)
D
Genk (45%)
W
OHL (39%)
W
Antwerp (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen A
4 - 4 D
54%
Club NXT A
0 - 3 L
49%
Lommel H
5 - 1 W
40%
Genk H
0 - 2 L
45%
Charleroi A
1 - 1 D
58%
Antwerp H
3 - 0 W
52%
Standard A
1 - 2 L
52%
Westerlo A
3 - 3 D
45%
Charleroi H
0 - 2 L
54%
Westerlo H
0 - 2 L
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Seraing H
2 - 1 W
33%
Juventus H
0 - 1 L
55%
Dunkerque A
0 - 2 L
47%
Charleroi H
0 - 2 L
54%
Westerlo A
2 - 1 W
45%
Genk H
0 - 0 D
45%
OHL H
2 - 1 W
39%
Antwerp A
5 - 0 W
57%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
50%
Antwerp H
1 - 2 L
52%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (47.3 vs 46.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

OHL holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Standard's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Standard holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.1 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to OHL's leaky backline that surrenders 2.0 goals per match.

OHL has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Standard has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: OHL is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for Standard. In practical terms, Standard would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Standard holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 6.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Belgian First Division A match (2026-05-08), Standard prevailed 2-1 against OHL. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Standard secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. OHL will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Standard will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

OHL

OHL

VS
Standard

Standard

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

OHL

2W 3D 5L · 17 goals scored · 20 conceded

Standard

4W 2D 4L · 13 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or