Skip to content
Compare Petrocub vs Egnatia

Petrocub vs Egnatia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Petrocub vs Egnatia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Petrocub Petrocub Home Team
Egnatia Egnatia Away Team
Petrocub
27.3
D L L D

Last 10 Matches

Egnatia
63.8
D W L D D W D

Performance Radar

Petrocub
Egnatia

Categories Won

1

Petrocub

3

Draw

11

Egnatia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 2D, 2L

29%

2W, 4D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

5 / 4 matches

2.6

18 / 7 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
3.2

13 / 4 matches

1.6

11 / 7 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 4 matches

14%

1 / 7 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
75%

3 / 4 matches

71%

5 / 7 matches

Both Teams to Score
75%

3 / 4 matches

86%

6 / 7 matches

Top Scorer
N. Rotaru (3 goals)
A. Albanese (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 2 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
61.5

League Difficulty: 87.5, Opponent Quality: 75.8

66.6

League Difficulty: 91.9, Opponent Quality: 71.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.45

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.2

3.19

Actual: 2.6 | Diff: -0.62

Adjusted Power Rating
27.3

Attack: 44.6, Defense: 0.0, Form: 0.0

63.8

Attack: 100, Defense: 54.4, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

3

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

76-90+'

4
Petrocub
Egnatia
Petrocub

Power Rating Breakdown

27.3

Overall

Attack 44.6
Defense 0.0
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.5
Egnatia

Power Rating Breakdown

63.8

Overall

Attack 100
Defense 54.4
Form 33.8
Consistency 66.9

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

87.5 vs 91.9

Opponent Quality

75.8 vs 71.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 20%
Petrocub logo Petrocub
D
Borac BB (67%)
L
Borac BB (70%)
L
Egnatia (85%)
D
Egnatia (81%)
Egnatia logo Egnatia
D
Lillestrøm (56%)
W
Shamrock (67%)
L
Shamrock (72%)
D
Celje (76%)
D
Celje (71%)
W
Petrocub (77%)
D
Petrocub (79%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Borac BB H
3 - 3 D
67%
Borac BB A
0 - 3 L
70%
Egnatia A
1 - 6 L
85%
Egnatia H
1 - 1 D
81%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lillestrøm H
0 - 0 D
56%
Shamrock H
5 - 1 W
67%
Shamrock A
1 - 3 L
72%
Celje A
2 - 2 D
76%
Celje H
3 - 3 D
71%
Petrocub H
6 - 1 W
77%
Petrocub A
1 - 1 D
79%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (61.5 vs 66.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Egnatia possess a formidable attacking unit, with A. Albanese accounting for 3 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.6 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Egnatia — 1.6 goals conceded per game and 1 clean sheets put them well ahead of Petrocub, who give up 3.2 goals per match at the other end.

Petrocub has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Egnatia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 4.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Petrocub is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Egnatia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 7 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Egnatia faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Petrocub can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 36.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Egnatia. In practical terms, Egnatia would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, Egnatia emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 63.8 compared to 27.3, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects Egnatia as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams met recently in the UEFA Champions League (2026-07-15): Egnatia defeated Petrocub 6-1. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Egnatia's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Petrocub. Egnatia secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 6-1 scoreline was emphatic — Egnatia completely dominated Petrocub in that encounter, raising serious questions about Petrocub's ability to compete at this level. Petrocub will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Egnatia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams drew 1-1 in the UEFA Champions League (2026-07-08). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Petrocub

Petrocub

VS
Egnatia

Egnatia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Petrocub

0W 2D 2L · 5 goals scored · 13 conceded

Egnatia

2W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or