Skip to content
Compare Portsmouth vs Forest

Portsmouth vs Forest Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Portsmouth vs Forest: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Portsmouth Portsmouth Home Team
Forest Forest Away Team
Portsmouth
26.2
L L L L D W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Forest
35.7
L W D W W L D L L W

Performance Radar

Portsmouth
Forest

Categories Won

3

Portsmouth

4

Draw

8

Forest

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 1D, 8L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-14

-14

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Hornby (3 goals)
J. Omewa (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.1

34.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.66

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.14

0.77

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
26.2

Attack: 22.6, Defense: 22.6, Form: 8.5

35.7

Attack: 25.3, Defense: 45.1, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

1

16-30'

4

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2

76-90+'

1
Portsmouth
Forest
Portsmouth

Power Rating Breakdown

26.2

Overall

Attack 22.6
Defense 22.6
Form 8.5
Consistency 74.8
Forest

Power Rating Breakdown

35.7

Overall

Attack 25.3
Defense 45.1
Form 33.8
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

48.1 vs 47.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Portsmouth logo Portsmouth
L
Crystal Palace (70%)
L
Forest (43%)
L
Sheff Utd (34%)
L
Sunderland (38%)
D
Bristol City (47%)
W
Charlton (43%)
L
Newcastle (54%)
L
Ipswich (52%)
Forest logo Forest
L
Southampton (53%)
W
Portsmouth (31%)
D
Newcastle (54%)
W
Durham (43%)
W
Ipswich (52%)
L
Crystal Palace (70%)
D
Sunderland (43%)
L
Charlton (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Crystal Palace A
1 - 6 L
70%
Forest H
0 - 1 L
43%
Sheff Utd A
1 - 2 L
34%
Sunderland H
0 - 1 L
38%
Bristol City H
2 - 2 D
47%
Charlton A
2 - 0 W
43%
Newcastle A
0 - 2 L
54%
Ipswich H
1 - 2 L
52%
Durham A
1 - 2 L
48%
Birmingham H
0 - 4 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Southampton H
0 - 3 L
53%
Portsmouth A
1 - 0 W
31%
Newcastle A
1 - 1 D
54%
Durham H
2 - 1 W
43%
Ipswich H
2 - 0 W
52%
Crystal Palace A
0 - 1 L
70%
Sunderland A
1 - 1 D
43%
Charlton H
0 - 2 L
38%
Birmingham A
1 - 5 L
57%
Sheff Utd H
1 - 0 W
30%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 34.8 vs 34.5), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Portsmouth (0.8 goals per match) and Forest (0.9 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Forest — 1.4 goals conceded per game and 3 clean sheets put them well ahead of Portsmouth, who give up 2.2 goals per match at the other end.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.6 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Portsmouth is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forest is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Portsmouth shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forest faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Portsmouth can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 74% win probability for Forest. In practical terms, Forest would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Forest has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.5-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent English WSL 2 match (2026-04-26), Forest prevailed 0-1 against Portsmouth. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Forest achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Portsmouth shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Portsmouth will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Forest will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Portsmouth

Portsmouth

VS
Forest

Forest

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Portsmouth

1W 1D 8L · 8 goals scored · 22 conceded

Forest

4W 2D 4L · 9 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or