Skip to content
Compare QOTS vs Alloa Athletic

QOTS vs Alloa Athletic Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare QOTS vs Alloa Athletic: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

QOTS QOTS Home Team
Alloa Athletic Alloa Athletic Away Team
QOTS
47.5
L L W D D D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Alloa Athletic
36.5
L D D L W L W W L L

Performance Radar

QOTS
Alloa Athletic

Categories Won

8

QOTS

6

Draw

1

Alloa Athletic

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Clark (7 goals)
L. Rankin (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4

50.3

League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 49.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.66

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
47.5

Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9

36.5

Attack: 33.4, Defense: 40.1, Form: 30.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

1
5

61-75'

3
7

76-90+'

3
QOTS
Alloa Athletic
QOTS

Power Rating Breakdown

47.5

Overall

Attack 57.8
Defense 48.2
Form 28.9
Consistency 62.8
Alloa Athletic

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 33.4
Defense 40.1
Form 30.1
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 51.0

Opponent Quality

47.4 vs 49.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
QOTS logo QOTS
L
Queen's Park (54%)
L
Aberdeen (60%)
W
Brora Rangers (42%)
D
Kelty Hearts (45%)
D
Stenhousemuir (64%)
D
Stenhousemuir (59%)
W
Alloa Athletic (39%)
D
Montrose (38%)
Alloa Athletic logo Alloa Athletic
L
Ayr Utd (53%)
D
Falkirk (43%)
D
Stranraer (38%)
L
Edinburgh City (46%)
W
Stenhousemuir (64%)
L
Stenhousemuir (59%)
W
Airdrieonians (52%)
W
Airdrieonians (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Queen's Park A
1 - 3 L
54%
Aberdeen H
1 - 4 L
60%
Brora Rangers A
3 - 0 W
42%
Kelty Hearts H
1 - 1 D
45%
Stenhousemuir A
2 - 2 D
64%
Stenhousemuir H
1 - 1 D
59%
Alloa Athletic A
4 - 1 W
39%
Montrose H
2 - 2 D
38%
Peterhead A
1 - 1 D
37%
Cove Rangers H
2 - 0 W
36%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ayr Utd A
1 - 4 L
53%
Falkirk H
1 - 1 D
43%
Stranraer H
2 - 2 D
38%
Edinburgh City A
0 - 2 L
46%
Stenhousemuir A
1 - 0 W
64%
Stenhousemuir H
1 - 3 L
59%
Airdrieonians A
2 - 1 W
52%
Airdrieonians H
1 - 0 W
46%
QOTS H
1 - 4 L
45%
Stenhousemuir A
0 - 1 L
52%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.4 vs 50.3), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, QOTS outperforms Alloa Athletic with 1.8 goals per match to 1.0, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

QOTS's backline outperforms Alloa Athletic's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.

QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Alloa Athletic has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, QOTS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Alloa Athletic can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for QOTS. In practical terms, QOTS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward QOTS, with a 11.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Scottish League One match (2026-05-02), QOTS prevailed 1-4 against Alloa Athletic. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, QOTS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Alloa Athletic shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 1-4 scoreline was emphatic — QOTS completely dominated Alloa Athletic in that encounter, raising serious questions about Alloa Athletic's ability to compete at this level. Alloa Athletic will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. QOTS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

QOTS

QOTS

VS
Alloa Athletic

Alloa Athletic

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

QOTS

3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

Alloa Athletic

3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or