TPS vs VPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare TPS vs VPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
TPS
Home Team
VPS
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
TPS
Draw
VPS
Statistical Comparison
4W, 3D, 3L
5W, 1D, 4L
15 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
+4
+6
4 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.17
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.29
Attack: 47.9, Defense: 60.7, Form: 38.3
Attack: 57.5, Defense: 57.5, Form: 47.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
TPS
VPS
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 45.8 vs 45.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
VPS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus TPS's 1.5, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Both defenses are comparable, with TPS conceding 1.1 and VPS conceding 1.2 per match.
TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: TPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📈 Form Momentum: VPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: Recent form is the strongest predictor of short-term performance. VPS's current run of 5 wins in 10 matches suggests they are playing at or near their peak capacity right now.
In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-14), TPS prevailed 1-3 against VPS. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, TPS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against VPS shows genuine quality and mental strength. VPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
TPS
VPS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
TPS
4W 3D 3L · 15 goals scored · 11 conceded
VPS
5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded
Popular Teams