Skip to content
Compare TPS vs VPS

TPS vs VPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare TPS vs VPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

TPS TPS Home Team
VPS VPS Away Team
TPS
48.6
D W D W L L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

VPS
51.8
W L W L L L W W D W

Performance Radar

TPS
VPS

Categories Won

3

TPS

5

Draw

7

VPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Muzaci (5 goals)
S. Lindholm (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.33

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.17

1.51

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.29

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 47.9, Defense: 60.7, Form: 38.3

51.8

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 57.5, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

5
5

46-60'

2

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

3
TPS
VPS
TPS

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 47.9
Defense 60.7
Form 38.3
Consistency 50.5
VPS

Power Rating Breakdown

51.8

Overall

Attack 57.5
Defense 57.5
Form 47.9
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.3 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
TPS logo TPS
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
VPS (55%)
D
KuPS (48%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
Ilves (44%)
W
Oulu (38%)
L
SJK (44%)
VPS logo VPS
W
Ilves (49%)
L
TPS (50%)
W
Jaro (38%)
L
Inter Turku (53%)
L
KuPS (48%)
L
HJK (60%)
W
SJK (40%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
VPS A
3 - 1 W
55%
KuPS A
1 - 1 D
48%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
29%
HJK A
0 - 1 L
60%
Ilves H
1 - 3 L
44%
Oulu H
3 - 0 W
38%
SJK A
1 - 3 L
44%
Jaro H
3 - 2 W
33%
Lahti A
0 - 0 D
59%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves A
1 - 0 W
49%
TPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Jaro A
3 - 1 W
38%
Inter Turku H
0 - 1 L
53%
KuPS A
1 - 3 L
48%
HJK A
1 - 2 L
60%
SJK H
1 - 0 W
40%
Mariehamn H
4 - 0 W
29%
Gnistan A
1 - 1 D
58%
Oulu H
5 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 45.8 vs 45.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

VPS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus TPS's 1.5, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with TPS conceding 1.1 and VPS conceding 1.2 per match.

TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: TPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: VPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: Recent form is the strongest predictor of short-term performance. VPS's current run of 5 wins in 10 matches suggests they are playing at or near their peak capacity right now.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-14), TPS prevailed 1-3 against VPS. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, TPS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against VPS shows genuine quality and mental strength. VPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

TPS

TPS

VS
VPS

VPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

TPS

4W 3D 3L · 15 goals scored · 11 conceded

VPS

5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or