Skip to content
Compare Tranmere vs Fleetwood

Tranmere vs Fleetwood Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Tranmere vs Fleetwood: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Tranmere Tranmere Home Team
Fleetwood Fleetwood Away Team
Tranmere
43.4
D W D W D L W L D L

Last 10 Matches

Fleetwood
49.4
D W W L D W W D D D

Performance Radar

Tranmere
Fleetwood

Categories Won

4

Tranmere

2

Draw

9

Fleetwood

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Smith (2 goals)
C. Evans (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.8

League Difficulty: 41.0, Opponent Quality: 45.6

44.6

League Difficulty: 42.5, Opponent Quality: 46.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.24

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.06

0.97

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
43.4

Attack: 40.6, Defense: 56.3, Form: 28.1

49.4

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 72.5, Form: 37.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

1
5

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

Tranmere
Fleetwood
Tranmere

Power Rating Breakdown

43.4

Overall

Attack 40.6
Defense 56.3
Form 28.1
Consistency 57.7
Fleetwood

Power Rating Breakdown

49.4

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 72.5
Form 37.8
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

41.0 vs 42.5

Opponent Quality

45.6 vs 46.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Tranmere logo Tranmere
D
Port Vale (51%)
W
Shrewsbury (33%)
D
Rochdale (35%)
W
Blackpool (52%)
D
Grimsby (51%)
L
MK Dons (44%)
W
Cheltenham (43%)
L
Bristol R (53%)
Fleetwood logo Fleetwood
D
Gillingham (38%)
W
Chesterfield (49%)
W
Chesterfield (46%)
L
Hartlepool (50%)
D
Bolton (56%)
W
Huddersfield (50%)
W
Chester (50%)
D
MK Dons (39%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Port Vale A
1 - 1 D
51%
Shrewsbury H
2 - 0 W
33%
Rochdale H
2 - 2 D
35%
Blackpool H
2 - 0 W
52%
Grimsby H
1 - 1 D
51%
MK Dons A
0 - 3 L
44%
Cheltenham A
3 - 1 W
43%
Bristol R H
1 - 2 L
53%
Chesterfield A
1 - 1 D
49%
Colchester H
0 - 1 L
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gillingham H
0 - 0 D
38%
Chesterfield A
1 - 0 W
49%
Chesterfield H
1 - 0 W
46%
Hartlepool A
0 - 1 L
50%
Bolton H
1 - 1 D
56%
Huddersfield H
2 - 1 W
50%
Chester H
2 - 0 W
50%
MK Dons H
1 - 1 D
39%
Shrewsbury A
2 - 2 D
38%
Chesterfield H
1 - 1 D
44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 43.8 vs 44.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

The attacking output of Tranmere and Fleetwood is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.3 and 1.1 goals per game respectively.

Fleetwood's backline outperforms Tranmere's, with 0.7 goals conceded per match versus 1.2.

Tranmere has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Fleetwood has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.1 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Fleetwood has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Fleetwood. In practical terms, Fleetwood would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

Fleetwood has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Tranmere

Tranmere

VS
Fleetwood

Fleetwood

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Tranmere

3W 4D 3L · 13 goals scored · 12 conceded

Fleetwood

4W 5D 1L · 11 goals scored · 7 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or