Skip to content
Compare Whitecaps vs Minnesota

Whitecaps vs Minnesota Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Whitecaps vs Minnesota: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Whitecaps Whitecaps Home Team
Minnesota Minnesota Away Team
Whitecaps
49.4
W L W D D L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

Minnesota
42.0
W L D D D L D L L D

Performance Radar

Whitecaps
Minnesota

Categories Won

10

Whitecaps

2

Draw

3

Minnesota

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

10%

1W, 5D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

0

0

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. White (4 goals)
K. Yeboah (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.0

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 54.3

50.7

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 47.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.0

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.1

1.35

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
49.4

Attack: 57.6, Defense: 54.6, Form: 36.4

42.0

Attack: 43.6, Defense: 57.1, Form: 10.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
5

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Whitecaps
Minnesota
Whitecaps

Power Rating Breakdown

49.4

Overall

Attack 57.6
Defense 54.6
Form 36.4
Consistency 50.5
Minnesota

Power Rating Breakdown

42.0

Overall

Attack 43.6
Defense 57.1
Form 10.1
Consistency 77.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

54.3 vs 47.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Whitecaps logo Whitecaps
W
Dallas (53%)
L
Houston (65%)
W
Sounders (36%)
D
LAFC (53%)
D
Minnesota (50%)
L
Cincinnati (61%)
W
San Diego (59%)
L
Houston (70%)
Minnesota logo Minnesota
W
Earthquakes (38%)
L
Atlanta United (44%)
D
Salt Lake (54%)
D
San Diego (54%)
D
Whitecaps (55%)
L
Sporting KC (46%)
D
Salt Lake (49%)
L
New England (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dallas H
5 - 0 W
53%
Houston H
0 - 1 L
65%
Sounders A
2 - 0 W
36%
LAFC H
1 - 1 D
53%
Minnesota A
0 - 0 D
50%
Cincinnati A
3 - 4 L
61%
San Diego A
4 - 2 W
59%
Houston A
0 - 1 L
70%
Dallas A
3 - 2 W
58%
Earthquakes A
1 - 1 D
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Earthquakes A
5 - 1 W
38%
Atlanta United H
1 - 2 L
44%
Salt Lake A
1 - 1 D
54%
San Diego H
1 - 1 D
54%
Whitecaps H
0 - 0 D
55%
Sporting KC A
1 - 2 L
46%
Salt Lake H
1 - 1 D
49%
New England A
1 - 2 L
53%
Colorado H
0 - 1 L
49%
Austin H
2 - 2 D
37%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 41.0 vs 50.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Whitecaps leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.9 goals per game compared to Minnesota's 1.3 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Both defenses are comparable, with Whitecaps conceding 1.2 and Minnesota conceding 1.3 per match.

Minnesota has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Whitecaps has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Minnesota is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Whitecaps is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Minnesota shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 68% win probability for Whitecaps. In practical terms, Whitecaps would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Whitecaps has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.4-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Major League Soccer (2026-07-26). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Whitecaps

Whitecaps

VS
Minnesota

Minnesota

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Whitecaps

4W 3D 3L · 19 goals scored · 12 conceded

Minnesota

1W 5D 4L · 13 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or