Azerbaiyán vs N. Macedonia Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compara Azerbaiyán vs N. Macedonia: estadísticas cara a cara, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Azerbaiyán
Equipo Local
N. Macedonia
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Azerbaiyán
Empate
N. Macedonia
Comparación Estadística
8V, 0E, 2D
2V, 0E, 6D
18 / 10 partidos
5 / 8 partidos
7 / 10 partidos
23 / 8 partidos
+11
-18
4 / 10 partidos
2 / 8 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
5 / 8 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
1 / 8 partidos
3V / 4 partidos
1V / 5 partidos
5V / 6 partidos
1V / 3 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 59.0, Calidad del Rival: 51.2
Dificultad de Liga: 53.8, Calidad del Rival: 60.6
0V / 1 partidos
0V / 3 partidos
Real: 1.8 | Dif: 0.0
Real: 0.6 | Dif: -0.01
Ataque: 54.9, Defensa: 70.2, Forma: 73.2
Ataque: 18.5, Defensa: 3.1, Forma: 23.2
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Azerbaiyán
N. Macedonia
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 41.5 vs 42.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Few sides can match Azerbaijan in front of goal. Their 1.8 average per fixture tells the story, with S. Cəfərzadə driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.
Defensively, Azerbaijan is far superior, conceding just 0.7 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while N. Macedonia leaks 2.9 goals per match.
N. Macedonia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Azerbaijan has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Azerbaijan is a strong road performer with a 83% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
🔥 Form Momentum: Azerbaijan is in scorching form, winning 8 of their last 10 matches with 18 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
❄️ Form Momentum: N. Macedonia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 8 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Azerbaijan is on the rise with 8W in last 10, while N. Macedonia shows signs of decline with 2W in last 8.
💡 Why This Matters: The 43.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Azerbaijan. In practical terms, Azerbaijan would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, Azerbaijan emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 64.5 compared to 20.7, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects Azerbaijan as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams met recently in the Women's European World Cup Qualifiers (2026-06-09): Azerbaijan defeated N. Macedonia 1-3. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Azerbaijan's ability to perform on the biggest stage against N. Macedonia. Notably, Azerbaijan achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against N. Macedonia shows genuine quality and mental strength. N. Macedonia will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Azerbaijan will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams met recently in the Women's European World Cup Qualifiers (2026-03-03): Azerbaijan defeated N. Macedonia 2-0. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Azerbaijan's ability to perform on the biggest stage against N. Macedonia. Azerbaijan secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. N. Macedonia will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Azerbaijan will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Azerbaiyán
N. Macedonia
En los enfrentamientos H2H (duelos directos), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo impone sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen comparativo
Esta comparación de enfrentamientos directos analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia en la forma y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las valoraciones de potencia se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles marcados, los goles en contra, la tasa de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Azerbaiyán
8W 0D 2L · 18 goles marcados · 7 goles en contra
N. Macedonia
2W 0D 6L · 5 goles marcados · 23 goles en contra
Equipos Populares