Annan vs Forfar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Annan vs Forfar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Annan
Home Team
Forfar
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Annan
Draw
Forfar
Statistical Comparison
2W, 1D, 7L
5W, 1D, 4L
9 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
24 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
-15
-6
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
4W / 6 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 37.2, Opponent Quality: 43.1
League Difficulty: 38.5, Opponent Quality: 44.1
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.28
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.27
Attack: 27.2, Defense: 18.1, Form: 18.1
Attack: 42.9, Defense: 30.6, Form: 46.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Annan
Forfar
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 40.7 vs 41.9), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Forfar leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.4 goals per game compared to Annan's 0.9 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Forfar has the defensive edge, conceding 2.0 per match compared to Annan's 2.4.
Annan has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Forfar has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Annan is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Forfar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forfar is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Annan shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forfar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Annan can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 13.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 83% win probability for Forfar. In practical terms, Forfar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Forfar has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Scottish League Two (2026-05-02). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Annan
Forfar
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Annan
2W 1D 7L · 9 goals scored · 24 conceded
Forfar
5W 1D 4L · 14 goals scored · 20 conceded
Popular Teams