Skip to content
Compare Annan vs Forfar

Annan vs Forfar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Annan vs Forfar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Annan Annan Home Team
Forfar Forfar Away Team
Annan
26.8
L L L L D L L W L W

Last 10 Matches

Forfar
40.1
W L L L L D W W W W

Performance Radar

Annan
Forfar

Categories Won

1

Annan

4

Draw

10

Forfar

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-15

-15

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Smith (4 goals)
S. Shepherd (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.7

League Difficulty: 37.2, Opponent Quality: 43.1

41.9

League Difficulty: 38.5, Opponent Quality: 44.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.62

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.28

1.13

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
26.8

Attack: 27.2, Defense: 18.1, Form: 18.1

40.1

Attack: 42.9, Defense: 30.6, Form: 46.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

3

46-60'

61-75'

2
5

76-90+'

4
Annan
Forfar
Annan

Power Rating Breakdown

26.8

Overall

Attack 27.2
Defense 18.1
Form 18.1
Consistency 57.7
Forfar

Power Rating Breakdown

40.1

Overall

Attack 42.9
Defense 30.6
Form 46.0
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

37.2 vs 38.5

Opponent Quality

43.1 vs 44.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Annan logo Annan
L
Clyde (49%)
L
Airdrieonians (44%)
L
Dundee (54%)
L
Ross County (53%)
D
Forfar (39%)
L
Clyde (43%)
L
Spartans (32%)
W
Elgin (28%)
Forfar logo Forfar
W
Brechin (36%)
L
Livingston (53%)
L
Partick (54%)
L
Hamilton (63%)
L
Hamilton (58%)
D
Annan (29%)
W
Edinburgh City (36%)
W
Stranraer (37%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Clyde A
1 - 4 L
49%
Airdrieonians A
0 - 3 L
44%
Dundee H
0 - 5 L
54%
Ross County H
1 - 4 L
53%
Forfar H
1 - 1 D
39%
Clyde A
1 - 3 L
43%
Spartans H
0 - 2 L
32%
Elgin A
3 - 0 W
28%
East Kilbride A
1 - 2 L
57%
Stranraer H
1 - 0 W
32%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brechin H
3 - 1 W
36%
Livingston A
0 - 8 L
53%
Partick H
0 - 4 L
54%
Hamilton A
1 - 2 L
63%
Hamilton H
1 - 3 L
58%
Annan A
1 - 1 D
29%
Edinburgh City H
4 - 0 W
36%
Stranraer A
1 - 0 W
37%
East Kilbride H
1 - 0 W
52%
Elgin H
2 - 1 W
23%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 40.7 vs 41.9), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Forfar leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.4 goals per game compared to Annan's 0.9 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Forfar has the defensive edge, conceding 2.0 per match compared to Annan's 2.4.

Annan has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Forfar has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Annan is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Forfar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forfar is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Annan shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forfar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Annan can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 13.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 83% win probability for Forfar. In practical terms, Forfar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Forfar has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Scottish League Two (2026-05-02). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Annan

Annan

VS
Forfar

Forfar

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Annan

2W 1D 7L · 9 goals scored · 24 conceded

Forfar

5W 1D 4L · 14 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or