Cardiff Met vs Penybont Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Cardiff Met vs Penybont: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Cardiff Met
Home Team
Penybont
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Cardiff Met
Draw
Penybont
Statistical Comparison
2W, 5D, 3L
1W, 2D, 7L
11 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
-3
-9
0 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.6
League Difficulty: 51.6, Opponent Quality: 56.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.04
Actual: 0.4 | Diff: +0.01
Attack: 35.0, Defense: 50.9, Form: 19.1
Attack: 12.1, Defense: 51.2, Form: 9.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Cardiff Met
Penybont
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 45.4 vs 40.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Cardiff Met leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.1 goals per game compared to Penybont's 0.4 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Cardiff Met giving up 1.4 and Penybont giving up 1.3 per fixture.
Cardiff Met has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.1 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
❄️ Form Momentum: Cardiff Met is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Penybont is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Cardiff Met faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Penybont can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 8.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for Cardiff Met. In practical terms, Cardiff Met would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
Cardiff Met has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.7-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Cardiff Met
Penybont
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Cardiff Met
2W 5D 3L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded
Penybont
1W 2D 7L · 4 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams