Skip to content
Compare Celje vs Shelbourne

Celje vs Shelbourne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Celje vs Shelbourne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Celje Celje Home Team
Shelbourne Shelbourne Away Team
Celje
49.5
D W L W W D L

Last 10 Matches

Shelbourne
57.3
W D W D L D W D D W

Performance Radar

Celje
Shelbourne

Categories Won

5

Celje

1

Draw

9

Shelbourne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
43%

3W, 2D, 2L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

11 / 7 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

14 / 7 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
29%

2 / 7 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
71%

5 / 7 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
43%

3 / 7 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Sešlar (2 goals)
H. Wood (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
62.8

League Difficulty: 80.7, Opponent Quality: 69.4

62.3

League Difficulty: 48.3, Opponent Quality: 51.3

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

100%

1W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.18

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.61

2.01

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
49.5

Attack: 60.2, Defense: 37.6, Form: 48.5

57.3

Attack: 67.4, Defense: 56.1, Form: 44.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

2
4

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

5
Celje
Shelbourne
Celje

Power Rating Breakdown

49.5

Overall

Attack 60.2
Defense 37.6
Form 48.5
Consistency 49.8
Shelbourne

Power Rating Breakdown

57.3

Overall

Attack 67.4
Defense 56.1
Form 44.9
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.7 vs 48.3

Opponent Quality

69.4 vs 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 100%
Celje logo Celje
D
Egnatia (94%)
W
AEK Athens (76%)
L
AEK Athens (71%)
W
Drita (51%)
W
Drita (55%)
D
Shelbourne (66%)
L
Rijeka (73%)
Shelbourne logo Shelbourne
W
Kalju (71%)
D
Kerry (46%)
W
Dundalk (51%)
D
Sligo (41%)
L
Bohemians (57%)
D
Drogheda (46%)
W
Shamrock (55%)
D
Galway Utd (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Egnatia A
3 - 3 D
94%
AEK Athens A
2 - 0 W
76%
AEK Athens H
0 - 4 L
71%
Drita H
3 - 2 W
51%
Drita A
3 - 2 W
55%
Shelbourne H
0 - 0 D
66%
Rijeka A
0 - 3 L
73%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kalju H
5 - 2 W
71%
Kerry A
2 - 2 D
46%
Dundalk H
2 - 1 W
51%
Sligo A
2 - 2 D
41%
Bohemians H
0 - 3 L
57%
Drogheda A
2 - 2 D
46%
Shamrock H
2 - 1 W
55%
Galway Utd H
1 - 1 D
46%
Derry A
0 - 0 D
46%
Waterford H
2 - 1 W
54%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 62.8 vs 62.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

The attacking output of Celje and Shelbourne is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.6 and 1.8 goals per game respectively.

Shelbourne's backline outperforms Celje's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.

Celje has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Shelbourne has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Shelbourne faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Celje can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for Shelbourne. In practical terms, Shelbourne would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Shelbourne, with a 7.8-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the UEFA Conference League (2025-12-18). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Celje

Celje

VS
Shelbourne

Shelbourne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Celje

3W 2D 2L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded

Shelbourne

4W 5D 1L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or