Skip to content
Compare Celtic vs Bo'ness Utd

Celtic vs Bo'ness Utd Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Celtic vs Bo'ness Utd: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Celtic Celtic Home Team
Bo'ness Utd Bo'ness Utd Away Team
Celtic
40.6
L D L L D L W D W D

Last 10 Matches

Bo'ness Utd
31.6
L W L D D L D L L L

Performance Radar

Celtic
Bo'ness Utd

Categories Won

11

Celtic

3

Draw

1

Bo'ness Utd

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Dargie (6 goals)
L. Hodgkiss (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.4

33.9

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 39.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.79

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: +0.51

1.14

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
40.6

Attack: 65.0, Defense: 25.4, Form: 17.0

31.6

Attack: 36.4, Defense: 28.0, Form: 8.4

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

2

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

3
6

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

3
Celtic
Bo'ness Utd
Celtic

Power Rating Breakdown

40.6

Overall

Attack 65.0
Defense 25.4
Form 17.0
Consistency 64.0
Bo'ness Utd

Power Rating Breakdown

31.6

Overall

Attack 36.4
Defense 28.0
Form 8.4
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

41.4 vs 39.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Celtic logo Celtic
L
East Stirling (32%)
D
Cowdenbeath (32%)
L
Linlithgow (62%)
L
Albion (48%)
D
Bonnyrigg RA (40%)
L
Tranent (55%)
W
Strollers (26%)
D
Bo'ness Utd (30%)
Bo'ness Utd logo Bo'ness Utd
L
Berwick (52%)
W
Cumbernauld C. (55%)
L
Fairydean (32%)
D
Tranent (55%)
D
Cowdenbeath (32%)
L
Strollers (31%)
D
Celtic (35%)
L
Gretna (34%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
East Stirling A
2 - 3 L
32%
Cowdenbeath H
2 - 2 D
32%
Linlithgow H
1 - 3 L
62%
Albion A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bonnyrigg RA H
3 - 3 D
40%
Tranent A
1 - 3 L
55%
Strollers H
6 - 0 W
26%
Bo'ness Utd A
2 - 2 D
30%
Clydebank H
3 - 1 W
58%
Broxburn Ath. A
1 - 1 D
31%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Berwick A
2 - 4 L
52%
Cumbernauld C. H
3 - 2 W
55%
Fairydean A
1 - 3 L
32%
Tranent A
1 - 1 D
55%
Cowdenbeath H
1 - 1 D
32%
Strollers A
0 - 1 L
31%
Celtic H
2 - 2 D
35%
Gretna A
0 - 1 L
34%
Hearts A
1 - 2 L
29%
Braves H
2 - 3 L
43%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 34.8 vs 33.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Celtic holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus Bo'ness Utd's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Celtic conceding 2.1 and Bo'ness Utd conceding 2.0 per match.

Celtic has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bo'ness Utd has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Celtic has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the Highland / Lowland (2026-03-07). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Celtic

Celtic

VS
Bo'ness Utd

Bo'ness Utd

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Celtic

2W 4D 4L · 23 goals scored · 21 conceded

Bo'ness Utd

1W 3D 6L · 13 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or