Skip to content
Compare Cercle Brugge vs KFUM

Cercle Brugge vs KFUM Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cercle Brugge vs KFUM: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cercle Brugge Cercle Brugge Home Team
KFUM KFUM Away Team
Cercle Brugge
44.6
L L W W W D W L L D

Last 10 Matches

KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Performance Radar

Cercle Brugge
KFUM

Categories Won

10

Cercle Brugge

3

Draw

2

KFUM

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Diakité (4 goals)
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.6

37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.99

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.09

0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
44.6

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 36.9, Form: 36.9

32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

Cercle Brugge
KFUM
Cercle Brugge

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 36.9
Form 36.9
Consistency 44.8
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

49.6 vs 50.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cercle Brugge logo Cercle Brugge
L
La Louvière (42%)
L
ZW (54%)
W
Dender (32%)
W
Dender (37%)
W
La Louvière (49%)
D
ZW (70%)
W
Anderlecht (55%)
L
La Louvière (49%)
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
La Louvière A
1 - 4 L
42%
ZW H
2 - 3 L
54%
Dender H
2 - 1 W
32%
Dender A
4 - 1 W
37%
La Louvière H
3 - 0 W
49%
ZW A
2 - 2 D
70%
Anderlecht A
3 - 2 W
55%
La Louvière H
1 - 3 L
49%
Sint-Truiden A
1 - 2 L
64%
Dender H
0 - 0 D
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.3 vs 37.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cercle Brugge holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus KFUM's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Cercle Brugge conceding 1.8 and KFUM conceding 1.7 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Cercle Brugge has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

VS
KFUM

KFUM

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Cercle Brugge

4W 2D 4L · 19 goals scored · 18 conceded

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or