Skip to content
Compare Cerezo vs Fagiano

Cerezo vs Fagiano Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cerezo vs Fagiano: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cerezo Cerezo Home Team
Fagiano Fagiano Away Team
Cerezo
58.6
W L W W W

Last 10 Matches

Fagiano
35.3
D W L L L W L

Performance Radar

Cerezo
Fagiano

Categories Won

9

Cerezo

2

Draw

4

Fagiano

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
80%

4W, 0D, 1L

29%

2W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

5 / 5 matches

0.7

5 / 7 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

4 / 5 matches

1.4

10 / 7 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
60%

3 / 5 matches

29%

2 / 7 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

2 / 5 matches

43%

3 / 7 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

1 / 5 matches

43%

3 / 7 matches

Top Scorer
S. Sakuragawa (2 goals)
N. Browne (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
100%

4W / 4 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.7

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.2

46.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.92

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.08

0.67

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
58.6

Attack: 31.9, Defense: 70.2, Form: 76.6

35.3

Attack: 22.5, Defense: 51.5, Form: 28.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

76-90+'

Cerezo
Fagiano
Cerezo

Power Rating Breakdown

58.6

Overall

Attack 31.9
Defense 70.2
Form 76.6
Consistency 56.8
Fagiano

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 22.5
Defense 51.5
Form 28.0
Consistency 48.6

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.2 vs 47.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cerezo logo Cerezo
W
Shimizu (48%)
L
Avispa (46%)
W
Fagiano (39%)
W
Dortmund (55%)
W
Tochigi City (43%)
Fagiano logo Fagiano
D
Tokyo Verdy (43%)
W
V-Varen (42%)
L
Cerezo (54%)
L
Schalke 04 (54%)
L
Bremen (51%)
W
Kharkiv (41%)
L
Wiesbaden (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shimizu H
1 - 0 W
48%
Avispa A
0 - 3 L
46%
Fagiano H
2 - 1 W
39%
Dortmund H
1 - 0 W
55%
Tochigi City H
1 - 0 W
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tokyo Verdy H
0 - 0 D
43%
V-Varen H
1 - 0 W
42%
Cerezo A
1 - 2 L
54%
Schalke 04 A
1 - 3 L
54%
Bremen A
0 - 2 L
51%
Kharkiv A
2 - 1 W
41%
Wiesbaden A
0 - 2 L
48%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 45.7 vs 46.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Cerezo holds the attacking edge with 1.0 goals per match versus Fagiano's 0.7, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Cerezo has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Fagiano's 1.4.

Cerezo has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Fagiano has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cerezo has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 1.9 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Cerezo has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.4 points per game over their last 5 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Fagiano is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 7 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Cerezo faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Fagiano can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 23.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Cerezo. In practical terms, Cerezo would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Cerezo in this contest. Their superior power rating of 58.6, compared to 35.3 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In their recent Japanese J1 League match (2026-08-08), Cerezo prevailed 2-1 against Fagiano. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Cerezo secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Fagiano will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cerezo will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cerezo

Cerezo

VS
Fagiano

Fagiano

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Cerezo

4W 0D 1L · 5 goals scored · 4 conceded

Fagiano

2W 1D 4L · 5 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or