Chelmsford vs Bath Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Chelmsford vs Bath: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Chelmsford
Home Team
Bath
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Chelmsford
Draw
Bath
Statistical Comparison
3W, 4D, 3L
3W, 2D, 5L
18 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
22 / 10 matches
+1
-6
3 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 39.9
League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.23
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2
Attack: 51.5, Defense: 37.2, Form: 25.8
Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Chelmsford
Bath
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (35.9 vs 40.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Chelmsford averaging 1.8 and Bath averaging 1.6 goals per match.
Defensively, Chelmsford holds the advantage — allowing just 1.7 goals per game against Bath's 2.2.
Chelmsford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chelmsford faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Bath can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 63% win probability for Chelmsford. In practical terms, Chelmsford would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
While Chelmsford holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 5.1-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Chelmsford
Bath
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Chelmsford
3W 4D 3L · 18 goals scored · 17 conceded
Bath
3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded
Popular Teams