Skip to content
Compare Chelmsford vs Enfield T

Chelmsford vs Enfield T Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chelmsford vs Enfield T: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chelmsford Chelmsford Home Team
Enfield T Enfield T Away Team
Chelmsford
41.2
L W D D D W D W L L

Last 10 Matches

Enfield T
36.0
D L W L D L L D W L

Performance Radar

Chelmsford
Enfield T

Categories Won

10

Chelmsford

2

Draw

3

Enfield T

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Taylor (4 goals)
S. Youngs (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.9

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 39.9

37.4

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 41.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.57

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.23

0.94

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.36

Adjusted Power Rating
41.2

Attack: 51.5, Defense: 37.2, Form: 25.8

36.0

Attack: 37.9, Defense: 40.8, Form: 17.5

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2
7

76-90+'

4
Chelmsford
Enfield T
Chelmsford

Power Rating Breakdown

41.2

Overall

Attack 51.5
Defense 37.2
Form 25.8
Consistency 57.7
Enfield T

Power Rating Breakdown

36.0

Overall

Attack 37.9
Defense 40.8
Form 17.5
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

39.9 vs 41.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chelmsford logo Chelmsford
L
Eastbourne (24%)
W
Chesham (48%)
D
Hornchurch (58%)
D
Maidenhead (43%)
D
Dag & Red (44%)
W
Enfield T (33%)
D
Totton (38%)
W
Chippenham (43%)
Enfield T logo Enfield T
D
Worthing (60%)
L
Hampton & RB (44%)
W
Slough (21%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
D
Hemel H (40%)
L
Chelmsford (45%)
L
Chesham (43%)
D
Worthing (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Eastbourne H
1 - 3 L
24%
Chesham A
2 - 0 W
48%
Hornchurch A
3 - 3 D
58%
Maidenhead H
1 - 1 D
43%
Dag & Red A
3 - 3 D
44%
Enfield T H
3 - 0 W
33%
Totton H
1 - 1 D
38%
Chippenham A
1 - 0 W
43%
Farnborough A
2 - 4 L
48%
Dover H
1 - 2 L
20%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
60%
Hampton & RB A
0 - 1 L
44%
Slough H
5 - 2 W
21%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 1 L
40%
Hemel H H
0 - 0 D
40%
Chelmsford A
0 - 3 L
45%
Chesham H
3 - 4 L
43%
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
54%
Dover H
3 - 1 W
20%
Salisbury A
0 - 2 L
46%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.9 vs 37.4), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Offensively, Chelmsford outperforms Enfield T with 1.8 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Defensively, Chelmsford and Enfield T are evenly matched, allowing 1.7 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.

Chelmsford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Enfield T has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.2 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Enfield T is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chelmsford faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Enfield T can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 63% win probability for Chelmsford. In practical terms, Chelmsford would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

While Chelmsford holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 5.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-03), Chelmsford prevailed 3-0 against Enfield T. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Chelmsford secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Chelmsford completely dominated Enfield T in that encounter, raising serious questions about Enfield T's ability to compete at this level. Enfield T will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chelmsford will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chelmsford

Chelmsford

VS
Enfield T

Enfield T

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chelmsford

3W 4D 3L · 18 goals scored · 17 conceded

Enfield T

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or