China vs Indonesia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare China vs Indonesia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
China
Home Team
Indonesia
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
China
Draw
Indonesia
Statistical Comparison
3W, 1D, 2L
5W, 1D, 4L
5 / 6 matches
17 / 10 matches
4 / 6 matches
11 / 10 matches
+1
+6
3 / 6 matches
6 / 10 matches
1 / 6 matches
5 / 10 matches
1 / 6 matches
1 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
5W / 8 matches
1W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7
League Difficulty: 74.0, Opponent Quality: 59.6
1W / 3 matches
1W / 3 matches
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.04
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.29
Attack: 29.4, Defense: 84.5, Form: 55.1
Attack: 61.6, Defense: 68.8, Form: 54.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
China
Indonesia
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (60.2 vs 58.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Indonesia leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to China's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
China has the defensive edge, conceding 0.7 per match compared to Indonesia's 1.1.
China has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Indonesia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.2 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Indonesia has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: China's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
These two teams met recently in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - Asia (2025-06-05): Indonesia defeated China 1-0. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Indonesia's ability to perform on the biggest stage against China. Indonesia secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. China will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Indonesia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
China
Indonesia
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
China
3W 1D 2L · 5 goals scored · 4 conceded
Indonesia
5W 1D 4L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams