Skip to content
Compare China vs Indonesia

China vs Indonesia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare China vs Indonesia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

China China Home Team
Indonesia Indonesia Away Team
China
53.0
D W L W W L

Last 10 Matches

Indonesia
57.8
W W L W L L D W L W

Performance Radar

China
Indonesia

Categories Won

5

China

3

Draw

7

Indonesia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

3W, 1D, 2L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

5 / 6 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.7

4 / 6 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
50%

3 / 6 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
17%

1 / 6 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
17%

1 / 6 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Zhang Yuning (2 goals)
O. Romeny (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

62%

5W / 8 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
60.2

League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

58.7

League Difficulty: 74.0, Opponent Quality: 59.6

Elite Opponent Record
33%

1W / 3 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.87

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.04

1.99

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.29

Adjusted Power Rating
53.0

Attack: 29.4, Defense: 84.5, Form: 55.1

57.8

Attack: 61.6, Defense: 68.8, Form: 54.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

5
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

4

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

1
China
Indonesia
China

Power Rating Breakdown

53.0

Overall

Attack 29.4
Defense 84.5
Form 55.1
Consistency 43.3
Indonesia

Power Rating Breakdown

57.8

Overall

Attack 61.6
Defense 68.8
Form 54.4
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

75.0 vs 74.0

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 59.6

Elite Opponent Record

33% vs 33%
China logo China
D
Thailand (77%)
W
Singapore (71%)
L
Cameroon (70%)
W
Curaçao (52%)
W
Bahrain (43%)
L
Indonesia (63%)
Indonesia logo Indonesia
W
Mozambique (45%)
W
Oman (58%)
L
Bulgaria (50%)
W
St. Kitts (59%)
L
Iraq (52%)
L
Saudi Arabia (44%)
D
Lebanon (78%)
W
Chinese Taipei (75%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Thailand H
0 - 0 D
77%
Singapore A
2 - 1 W
71%
Cameroon A
0 - 2 L
70%
Curaçao H
2 - 0 W
52%
Bahrain H
1 - 0 W
43%
Indonesia A
0 - 1 L
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mozambique H
1 - 0 W
45%
Oman H
3 - 0 W
58%
Bulgaria H
0 - 1 L
50%
St. Kitts H
4 - 0 W
59%
Iraq A
0 - 1 L
52%
Saudi Arabia H
2 - 3 L
44%
Lebanon H
0 - 0 D
78%
Chinese Taipei H
6 - 0 W
75%
Japan A
0 - 6 L
75%
China H
1 - 0 W
60%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (60.2 vs 58.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Indonesia leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to China's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

China has the defensive edge, conceding 0.7 per match compared to Indonesia's 1.1.

China has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Indonesia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.2 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Indonesia has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: China's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

These two teams met recently in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - Asia (2025-06-05): Indonesia defeated China 1-0. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Indonesia's ability to perform on the biggest stage against China. Indonesia secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. China will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Indonesia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

China

China

VS
Indonesia

Indonesia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

China

3W 1D 2L · 5 goals scored · 4 conceded

Indonesia

5W 1D 4L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or