Skip to content
Compare Cliftonville vs Bangor

Cliftonville vs Bangor Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cliftonville vs Bangor: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cliftonville Cliftonville Home Team
Bangor Bangor Away Team
Cliftonville
59.7
L W W L W W W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Bangor
44.0
L L D W L D W W W L

Performance Radar

Cliftonville
Bangor

Categories Won

12

Cliftonville

2

Draw

1

Bangor

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
70%

7W, 0D, 3L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

0

0

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. McStravick (3 goals)
J. Boyd (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
71%

5W / 7 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.1

League Difficulty: 43.2, Opponent Quality: 48.1

44.3

League Difficulty: 44.1, Opponent Quality: 44.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.5

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1

1.22

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.28

Adjusted Power Rating
59.7

Attack: 51.3, Defense: 70.5, Form: 67.3

44.0

Attack: 47.1, Defense: 47.1, Form: 37.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2

46-60'

1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

1
Cliftonville
Bangor
Cliftonville

Power Rating Breakdown

59.7

Overall

Attack 51.3
Defense 70.5
Form 67.3
Consistency 43.3
Bangor

Power Rating Breakdown

44.0

Overall

Attack 47.1
Defense 47.1
Form 37.7
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

43.2 vs 44.1

Opponent Quality

48.1 vs 44.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cliftonville logo Cliftonville
L
Linfield (53%)
W
Bangor (49%)
W
Crusaders (50%)
L
Alvechurch (48%)
W
Warrenpoint (42%)
W
Newington (40%)
W
Moyola Park (36%)
L
Dungannon (55%)
Bangor logo Bangor
L
Dungannon (60%)
L
Cliftonville (55%)
D
Dergview (43%)
W
Ballinamallard (41%)
L
Newry City (48%)
D
Dundela (39%)
W
Oxford Sunny (41%)
W
Moyola Park (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Linfield A
0 - 1 L
53%
Bangor A
3 - 0 W
49%
Crusaders H
2 - 1 W
50%
Alvechurch H
1 - 2 L
48%
Warrenpoint H
2 - 1 W
42%
Newington H
1 - 0 W
40%
Moyola Park H
3 - 0 W
36%
Dungannon H
1 - 2 L
55%
Linfield A
2 - 1 W
53%
Dungannon H
1 - 0 W
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dungannon A
0 - 2 L
60%
Cliftonville H
0 - 3 L
55%
Dergview A
1 - 1 D
43%
Ballinamallard A
2 - 1 W
41%
Newry City A
0 - 1 L
48%
Dundela A
1 - 1 D
39%
Oxford Sunny A
5 - 1 W
41%
Moyola Park A
2 - 1 W
38%
Ards H
2 - 0 W
37%
Portadown H
2 - 4 L
42%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.1 vs 44.3), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Cliftonville averaging 1.6 and Bangor averaging 1.5 goals per match.

Cliftonville's backline outperforms Bangor's, with 0.8 goals conceded per match versus 1.5.

Cliftonville has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bangor has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cliftonville is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

🔥 Form Momentum: Cliftonville is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 16 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Cliftonville is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Bangor shows signs of decline with 4W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Cliftonville. In practical terms, Cliftonville would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Cliftonville in this contest. Their superior power rating of 59.7, compared to 44.0 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In their recent Irish Premiership match (2026-08-15), Cliftonville prevailed 0-3 against Bangor. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Cliftonville achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Bangor shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-3 scoreline was emphatic — Cliftonville completely dominated Bangor in that encounter, raising serious questions about Bangor's ability to compete at this level. Bangor will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cliftonville will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cliftonville

Cliftonville

VS
Bangor

Bangor

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Cliftonville

7W 0D 3L · 16 goals scored · 8 conceded

Bangor

4W 2D 4L · 15 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or