Skip to content
Compare Enfield T vs Bath

Enfield T vs Bath Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Enfield T vs Bath: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Enfield T Enfield T Home Team
Bath Bath Away Team
Enfield T
36.0
D L W L D L L D W L

Last 10 Matches

Bath
36.1
D L L W L W L W L D

Performance Radar

Enfield T
Bath

Categories Won

2

Enfield T

3

Draw

10

Bath

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Youngs (3 goals)
S. Wilson (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.4

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 41.3

40.6

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.94

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.36

1.4

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
36.0

Attack: 37.9, Defense: 40.8, Form: 17.5

36.1

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
Enfield T
Bath
Enfield T

Power Rating Breakdown

36.0

Overall

Attack 37.9
Defense 40.8
Form 17.5
Consistency 61.3
Bath

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 24.2
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

41.3 vs 45.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Enfield T logo Enfield T
D
Worthing (60%)
L
Hampton & RB (44%)
W
Slough (21%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
D
Hemel H (40%)
L
Chelmsford (45%)
L
Chesham (43%)
D
Worthing (54%)
Bath logo Bath
D
Newport (45%)
L
Plymouth (62%)
L
Maidstone (57%)
W
Dorking (39%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Chesham (43%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Chippenham (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
60%
Hampton & RB A
0 - 1 L
44%
Slough H
5 - 2 W
21%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 1 L
40%
Hemel H H
0 - 0 D
40%
Chelmsford A
0 - 3 L
45%
Chesham H
3 - 4 L
43%
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
54%
Dover H
3 - 1 W
20%
Salisbury A
0 - 2 L
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newport H
2 - 2 D
45%
Plymouth H
0 - 3 L
62%
Maidstone H
2 - 3 L
57%
Dorking A
3 - 1 W
39%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Chesham H
4 - 2 W
43%
Torquay A
1 - 4 L
53%
Chippenham H
1 - 0 W
38%
Maidenhead A
0 - 3 L
48%
Eastbourne A
2 - 2 D
29%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (37.4 vs 40.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, Bath outperforms Enfield T with 1.6 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Enfield T has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Bath's 2.2.

Enfield T has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.4 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Enfield T is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Bath's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Enfield T

Enfield T

VS
Bath

Bath

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Enfield T

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 16 conceded

Bath

3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or