Skip to content
Compare Enfield T vs Chelmsford

Enfield T vs Chelmsford Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Enfield T vs Chelmsford: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Enfield T Enfield T Home Team
Chelmsford Chelmsford Away Team
Enfield T
36.0
D L W L D L L D W L

Last 10 Matches

Chelmsford
41.2
L W D D D W D W L L

Performance Radar

Enfield T
Chelmsford

Categories Won

3

Enfield T

2

Draw

10

Chelmsford

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Youngs (3 goals)
L. Taylor (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.4

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 41.3

35.9

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 39.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.94

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.36

1.57

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
36.0

Attack: 37.9, Defense: 40.8, Form: 17.5

41.2

Attack: 51.5, Defense: 37.2, Form: 25.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

7
Enfield T
Chelmsford
Enfield T

Power Rating Breakdown

36.0

Overall

Attack 37.9
Defense 40.8
Form 17.5
Consistency 61.3
Chelmsford

Power Rating Breakdown

41.2

Overall

Attack 51.5
Defense 37.2
Form 25.8
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 30.0

Opponent Quality

41.3 vs 39.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Enfield T logo Enfield T
D
Worthing (60%)
L
Hampton & RB (44%)
W
Slough (21%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
D
Hemel H (40%)
L
Chelmsford (45%)
L
Chesham (43%)
D
Worthing (54%)
Chelmsford logo Chelmsford
L
Eastbourne (24%)
W
Chesham (48%)
D
Hornchurch (58%)
D
Maidenhead (43%)
D
Dag & Red (44%)
W
Enfield T (33%)
D
Totton (38%)
W
Chippenham (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
60%
Hampton & RB A
0 - 1 L
44%
Slough H
5 - 2 W
21%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 1 L
40%
Hemel H H
0 - 0 D
40%
Chelmsford A
0 - 3 L
45%
Chesham H
3 - 4 L
43%
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
54%
Dover H
3 - 1 W
20%
Salisbury A
0 - 2 L
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Eastbourne H
1 - 3 L
24%
Chesham A
2 - 0 W
48%
Hornchurch A
3 - 3 D
58%
Maidenhead H
1 - 1 D
43%
Dag & Red A
3 - 3 D
44%
Enfield T H
3 - 0 W
33%
Totton H
1 - 1 D
38%
Chippenham A
1 - 0 W
43%
Farnborough A
2 - 4 L
48%
Dover H
1 - 2 L
20%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (37.4 vs 35.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Chelmsford leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Enfield T's 1.3 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Both defenses are comparable, with Enfield T conceding 1.6 and Chelmsford conceding 1.7 per match.

Enfield T has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chelmsford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Enfield T is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chelmsford faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Enfield T can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 63% win probability for Chelmsford. In practical terms, Chelmsford would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

Chelmsford has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.2-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-03), Chelmsford prevailed 3-0 against Enfield T. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Chelmsford secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Chelmsford completely dominated Enfield T in that encounter, raising serious questions about Enfield T's ability to compete at this level. Enfield T will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chelmsford will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Enfield T

Enfield T

VS
Chelmsford

Chelmsford

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Enfield T

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 16 conceded

Chelmsford

3W 4D 3L · 18 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or