Skip to content
Compare Fulham vs Forest

Fulham vs Forest Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fulham vs Forest: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fulham Fulham Home Team
Forest Forest Away Team
Fulham
45.8
L W D L L W D L W D

Last 10 Matches

Forest
73.3
W W D L D L W W W W

Performance Radar

Fulham
Forest

Categories Won

2

Fulham

2

Draw

11

Forest

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

+11

+11

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Cairney (1 goals)
M. Gibbs-White (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
65.7

League Difficulty: 92.7, Opponent Quality: 69.5

67.3

League Difficulty: 84.8, Opponent Quality: 66.8

Elite Opponent Record
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.8

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.1

2.52

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.32

Adjusted Power Rating
45.8

Attack: 27.0, Defense: 77.1, Form: 34.7

73.3

Attack: 86.0, Defense: 74.3, Form: 70.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

5
Fulham
Forest
Fulham

Power Rating Breakdown

45.8

Overall

Attack 27.0
Defense 77.1
Form 34.7
Consistency 53.2
Forest

Power Rating Breakdown

73.3

Overall

Attack 86.0
Defense 74.3
Form 70.4
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

92.7 vs 84.8

Opponent Quality

69.5 vs 66.8

Elite Opponent Record

17% vs 40%
Fulham logo Fulham
L
Norwich (54%)
W
Newcastle (64%)
D
Wolves (60%)
L
Bournemouth (80%)
L
Arsenal (84%)
W
Villa (79%)
D
Brentford (70%)
L
Liverpool (72%)
Forest logo Forest
W
Blackburn (49%)
W
Notts Co (50%)
D
Bournemouth (80%)
L
Man Utd (84%)
D
Newcastle (64%)
L
Villa (78%)
W
Chelsea (66%)
W
Villa (73%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Norwich H
0 - 2 L
54%
Newcastle H
2 - 0 W
64%
Wolves A
1 - 1 D
60%
Bournemouth H
0 - 1 L
80%
Arsenal A
0 - 3 L
84%
Villa H
1 - 0 W
79%
Brentford A
0 - 0 D
70%
Liverpool A
0 - 2 L
72%
Burnley H
3 - 1 W
48%
Forest A
0 - 0 D
84%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Blackburn A
3 - 0 W
49%
Notts Co A
2 - 0 W
50%
Bournemouth H
1 - 1 D
80%
Man Utd A
2 - 3 L
84%
Newcastle H
1 - 1 D
64%
Villa A
0 - 4 L
78%
Chelsea A
3 - 1 W
66%
Villa H
1 - 0 W
73%
Sunderland A
5 - 0 W
76%
Burnley H
4 - 1 W
48%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 65.7 vs 67.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Forest's attack is on another level, averaging 2.2 goals per match with M. Gibbs-White leading the charge (6 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Fulham giving up 1.0 and Forest giving up 1.1 per fixture.

Fulham has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Forest has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Forest is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

📈 Form Momentum: Forest has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forest is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Fulham shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 27.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Forest. In practical terms, Forest would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Forest holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 73.3 against 45.8 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Premier League (2026-03-15). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fulham

Fulham

VS
Forest

Forest

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Fulham

3W 3D 4L · 7 goals scored · 10 conceded

Forest

6W 2D 2L · 22 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or