Fulham vs Forest Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Fulham vs Forest: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Fulham
Home Team
Forest
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Fulham
Draw
Forest
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
6W, 2D, 2L
7 / 10 matches
22 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
-3
+11
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
0W / 5 matches
4W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 92.7, Opponent Quality: 69.5
League Difficulty: 84.8, Opponent Quality: 66.8
1W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.1
Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.32
Attack: 27.0, Defense: 77.1, Form: 34.7
Attack: 86.0, Defense: 74.3, Form: 70.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Fulham
Forest
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 65.7 vs 67.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Forest's attack is on another level, averaging 2.2 goals per match with M. Gibbs-White leading the charge (6 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Fulham giving up 1.0 and Forest giving up 1.1 per fixture.
Fulham has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Forest has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Forest is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.
📈 Form Momentum: Forest has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forest is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Fulham shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 27.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Forest. In practical terms, Forest would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Forest holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 73.3 against 45.8 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
These two teams drew 0-0 in the Premier League (2026-03-15). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Fulham
Forest
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Fulham
3W 3D 4L · 7 goals scored · 10 conceded
Forest
6W 2D 2L · 22 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams