Fylde vs Curzon Ashton Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Fylde vs Curzon Ashton: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Fylde
Home Team
Curzon Ashton
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Fylde
Draw
Curzon Ashton
Statistical Comparison
6W, 0D, 4L
1W, 4D, 5L
21 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
+7
-11
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 36.0, Opponent Quality: 40.3
League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 42.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.33
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.16
Attack: 62.0, Defense: 47.3, Form: 53.2
Attack: 29.3, Defense: 26.4, Form: 8.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Fylde
Curzon Ashton
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 38.6 vs 38.0), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Few sides can match Fylde in front of goal. Their 2.1 average per fixture tells the story, with L. Thomas driving that output personally responsible for 5 goals this campaign.
Fylde's backline outperforms Curzon Ashton's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 2.1.
Fylde has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Curzon Ashton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Fylde is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Statistical modeling projects 3.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Fylde has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Curzon Ashton is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Fylde is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Curzon Ashton shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Fylde faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Curzon Ashton can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 22.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Fylde. In practical terms, Fylde would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Fylde in this contest. Their superior power rating of 51.6, compared to 29.4 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Fylde
Curzon Ashton
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Fylde
6W 0D 4L · 21 goals scored · 14 conceded
Curzon Ashton
1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded
Popular Teams