Skip to content
Compare Gillingham vs Cheltenham

Gillingham vs Cheltenham Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gillingham vs Cheltenham: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gillingham Gillingham Home Team
Cheltenham Cheltenham Away Team
Gillingham
31.8
W L L L D W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Cheltenham
35.8
L L L W W W D L L D

Performance Radar

Gillingham
Cheltenham

Categories Won

3

Gillingham

3

Draw

9

Cheltenham

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-10

-10

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Hale (3 goals)
I. Hutchinson (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.1

League Difficulty: 40.0, Opponent Quality: 46.8

43.7

League Difficulty: 40.0, Opponent Quality: 46.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.05

1.13

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
31.8

Attack: 31.4, Defense: 31.4, Form: 18.8

35.8

Attack: 40.6, Defense: 31.2, Form: 28.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

4
Gillingham
Cheltenham
Gillingham

Power Rating Breakdown

31.8

Overall

Attack 31.4
Defense 31.4
Form 18.8
Consistency 59.2
Cheltenham

Power Rating Breakdown

35.8

Overall

Attack 40.6
Defense 31.2
Form 28.1
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

40.0 vs 40.0

Opponent Quality

46.8 vs 46.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gillingham logo Gillingham
W
Shrewsbury (33%)
L
Barnet (65%)
L
Grimsby (51%)
L
Cheltenham (42%)
D
Salford (55%)
W
Accrington (27%)
D
Walsall (46%)
L
Crawley (47%)
Cheltenham logo Cheltenham
L
Colchester (43%)
L
Bristol Rovers (67%)
L
Tranmere (31%)
W
Newport (42%)
W
Gillingham (32%)
W
Walsall (46%)
D
Cambridge Utd (49%)
L
Chesterfield (60%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shrewsbury H
1 - 0 W
33%
Barnet A
2 - 6 L
65%
Grimsby H
1 - 4 L
51%
Cheltenham A
1 - 2 L
42%
Salford A
0 - 0 D
55%
Accrington H
2 - 0 W
27%
Walsall A
2 - 2 D
46%
Crawley A
0 - 2 L
47%
Bristol Rovers H
1 - 2 L
62%
Swindon H
0 - 2 L
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Colchester H
1 - 4 L
43%
Bristol Rovers A
0 - 4 L
67%
Tranmere H
1 - 3 L
31%
Newport H
1 - 0 W
42%
Gillingham H
2 - 1 W
32%
Walsall A
4 - 0 W
46%
Cambridge Utd H
1 - 1 D
49%
Chesterfield A
0 - 1 L
60%
Notts Co A
2 - 5 L
54%
Crewe H
1 - 1 D
38%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.1 vs 43.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cheltenham holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Gillingham's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Gillingham conceding 2.0 and Cheltenham conceding 2.0 per match.

Gillingham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cheltenham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

In their recent League Two match (2026-04-14), Cheltenham prevailed 2-1 against Gillingham. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Cheltenham secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Gillingham will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cheltenham will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gillingham

Gillingham

VS
Cheltenham

Cheltenham

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gillingham

2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 20 conceded

Cheltenham

3W 2D 5L · 13 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or