Skip to content
Compare Gretna vs Clydebank

Gretna vs Clydebank Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gretna vs Clydebank: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gretna Gretna Home Team
Clydebank Clydebank Away Team
Gretna
23.7
L D L L L L L W L D

Last 10 Matches

Clydebank
66.9
W D W W D W L W W W

Performance Radar

Gretna
Clydebank

Categories Won

1

Gretna

3

Draw

11

Clydebank

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 2D, 7L

70%

7W, 2D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

3.0

30 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
3.6

36 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-24

-24

+19

+19

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
I. Anderson (5 goals)
N. McLaughlin (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 17
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

83%

5W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
33.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 39.6

35.8

League Difficulty: 29.0, Opponent Quality: 40.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.0

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.2

2.49

Actual: 3.0 | Diff: +0.51

Adjusted Power Rating
23.7

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 0.0, Form: 8.4

66.9

Attack: 85.8, Defense: 54.3, Form: 60.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

5
4

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

5
3

76-90+'

7
Gretna
Clydebank
Gretna

Power Rating Breakdown

23.7

Overall

Attack 33.5
Defense 0.0
Form 8.4
Consistency 74.5
Clydebank

Power Rating Breakdown

66.9

Overall

Attack 85.8
Defense 54.3
Form 60.1
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 29.0

Opponent Quality

39.6 vs 40.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gretna logo Gretna
L
Clydebank (63%)
D
Cumbernauld C. (38%)
L
Kilwinning (37%)
L
Troon (38%)
L
Gala (32%)
L
Berwick (35%)
L
Cumbernauld C. (43%)
W
Cowdenbeath (34%)
Clydebank logo Clydebank
W
Gretna (17%)
D
Braves (48%)
W
Hibernian (42%)
W
Troon (36%)
D
Partick (55%)
W
Braves (43%)
L
Linlithgow (44%)
W
Broxburn Ath. (33%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Clydebank A
1 - 7 L
63%
Cumbernauld C. H
3 - 3 D
38%
Kilwinning H
1 - 5 L
37%
Troon A
1 - 4 L
38%
Gala A
0 - 3 L
32%
Berwick H
2 - 7 L
35%
Cumbernauld C. A
1 - 3 L
43%
Cowdenbeath H
2 - 1 W
34%
Albion A
0 - 2 L
46%
East Stirling H
1 - 1 D
30%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gretna H
7 - 1 W
17%
Braves A
2 - 2 D
48%
Hibernian H
4 - 0 W
42%
Troon H
3 - 2 W
36%
Partick H
2 - 2 D
55%
Braves H
2 - 0 W
43%
Linlithgow A
1 - 4 L
44%
Broxburn Ath. H
4 - 0 W
33%
Cowdenbeath A
4 - 0 W
39%
Albion A
1 - 0 W
46%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 33.8 vs 35.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Clydebank's attack is on another level, averaging 3.0 goals per match with N. McLaughlin leading the charge (7 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Clydebank — 1.1 goals conceded per game and 5 clean sheets put them well ahead of Gretna, who give up 3.6 goals per match at the other end.

Gretna has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Clydebank has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Clydebank has an exceptional home record with a 83% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Gretna is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

🔥 Form Momentum: Clydebank is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 30 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Clydebank is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Gretna shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 43.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Clydebank. In practical terms, Clydebank would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Clydebank is the clear and dominant favorite. With a power rating of 66.9 vs 23.7, and superior metrics across the board, Clydebank should win this comfortably.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-08-22), Clydebank prevailed 7-1 against Gretna. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Clydebank secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 7-1 scoreline was emphatic — Clydebank completely dominated Gretna in that encounter, raising serious questions about Gretna's ability to compete at this level. Gretna will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Clydebank will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gretna

Gretna

VS
Clydebank

Clydebank

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gretna

1W 2D 7L · 12 goals scored · 36 conceded

Clydebank

7W 2D 1L · 30 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or