Skip to content
Compare Hartberg vs Kudrivka

Hartberg vs Kudrivka Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hartberg vs Kudrivka: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hartberg Hartberg Home Team
Kudrivka Kudrivka Away Team
Hartberg
35.2
W L L L W D D L L D

Last 10 Matches

Kudrivka
39.8
L W W L D L L L L L

Performance Radar

Hartberg
Kudrivka

Categories Won

5

Hartberg

3

Draw

7

Kudrivka

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Havel (3 goals)
A. Storchous (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.1

67.5

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 72.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

12%

1W / 8 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

1.22

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.42

Adjusted Power Rating
35.2

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 18.1

39.8

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 58.8, Form: 23.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

3

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

1

61-75'

2

76-90+'

3
Hartberg
Kudrivka
Hartberg

Power Rating Breakdown

35.2

Overall

Attack 33.2
Defense 42.3
Form 18.1
Consistency 61.3
Kudrivka

Power Rating Breakdown

39.8

Overall

Attack 31.3
Defense 58.8
Form 23.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

53.1 vs 72.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 12%
Hartberg logo Hartberg
W
RB Salzburg (51%)
L
Sturm (62%)
L
Austria (47%)
L
LASK (64%)
W
Rapid Vienna (44%)
D
Rapid Vienna (39%)
D
Sturm (66%)
L
RB Salzburg (46%)
Kudrivka logo Kudrivka
L
Dynamo Kyiv (82%)
W
LNZ Cherkasy (73%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (45%)
L
Kolos (82%)
D
Obolon (61%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
L
Metalist 1925 (80%)
L
Kryvbas KR (72%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
RB Salzburg A
3 - 1 W
51%
Sturm H
2 - 4 L
62%
Austria A
0 - 1 L
47%
LASK H
1 - 5 L
64%
Rapid Vienna A
2 - 0 W
44%
Rapid Vienna H
2 - 2 D
39%
Sturm A
0 - 0 D
66%
RB Salzburg H
1 - 2 L
46%
Austria H
0 - 1 L
42%
LASK A
0 - 0 D
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dynamo Kyiv A
2 - 3 L
82%
LNZ Cherkasy H
1 - 0 W
73%
Rukh Vynnyky H
2 - 1 W
45%
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
82%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
61%
Shakhtar D H
1 - 3 L
78%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 1 L
80%
Kryvbas KR H
1 - 2 L
72%
Epitsentr A
0 - 1 L
72%
Polissya H
0 - 2 L
79%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Kudrivka has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Hartberg (SoS: 40.6). This means Kudrivka's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Hartberg holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus Kudrivka's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hartberg conceding 1.6 and Kudrivka conceding 1.5 per match.

Kudrivka has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 8 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hartberg

Hartberg

VS
Kudrivka

Kudrivka

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hartberg

2W 3D 5L · 11 goals scored · 16 conceded

Kudrivka

2W 1D 7L · 8 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or