Skip to content
Compare Hearts vs Tranent

Hearts vs Tranent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hearts vs Tranent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hearts Hearts Home Team
Tranent Tranent Away Team
Hearts
26.2
W L W L L L D L L W

Last 10 Matches

Tranent
51.0
W W W W L D L D W W

Performance Radar

Hearts
Tranent

Categories Won

3

Hearts

2

Draw

10

Tranent

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.8

28 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

+10

+10

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Wilson (2 goals)
G. McGarry (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.0

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 40.4

29.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 33.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.1

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.1

1.21

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.49

Adjusted Power Rating
26.2

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 5.7, Form: 25.5

51.0

Attack: 45.2, Defense: 61.2, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

1
5

46-60'

7
2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

2
Hearts
Tranent
Hearts

Power Rating Breakdown

26.2

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 5.7
Form 25.5
Consistency 46.0
Tranent

Power Rating Breakdown

51.0

Overall

Attack 45.2
Defense 61.2
Form 47.9
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

27.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

40.4 vs 33.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hearts logo Hearts
W
Berwick (48%)
L
Cowdenbeath (39%)
W
Albion (41%)
L
East Stirling (35%)
L
Clydebank (58%)
L
Bonnyrigg RA (52%)
D
Gretna (17%)
L
Cumbernauld C. (43%)
Tranent logo Tranent
W
East Stirling (35%)
W
Stirling Unv (17%)
W
Linlithgow (38%)
W
Broxburn Ath. (33%)
L
Braves (48%)
D
Berwick (40%)
L
Linlithgow (38%)
D
Bo'ness Utd (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Berwick A
4 - 3 W
48%
Cowdenbeath A
0 - 3 L
39%
Albion H
3 - 0 W
41%
East Stirling A
2 - 4 L
35%
Clydebank H
0 - 8 L
58%
Bonnyrigg RA A
0 - 4 L
52%
Gretna H
1 - 1 D
17%
Cumbernauld C. A
0 - 3 L
43%
Broxburn Ath. H
0 - 1 L
33%
Bo'ness Utd H
2 - 1 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
East Stirling A
3 - 0 W
35%
Stirling Unv A
2 - 1 W
17%
Linlithgow H
1 - 0 W
38%
Broxburn Ath. H
3 - 0 W
33%
Braves A
0 - 3 L
48%
Berwick A
0 - 0 D
40%
Linlithgow H
0 - 1 L
38%
Bo'ness Utd H
1 - 1 D
38%
Gala H
2 - 1 W
26%
Stirling Unv A
5 - 0 W
17%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (35.0 vs 29.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Tranent leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to Hearts's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Tranent is far superior, conceding just 0.7 goals per match with 5 clean sheets, while Hearts leaks 2.8 goals per match.

Hearts has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tranent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tranent is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.2 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Tranent has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Tranent is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Hearts shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 24.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Tranent. In practical terms, Tranent would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Tranent holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 51.0 against 26.2 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hearts

Hearts

VS
Tranent

Tranent

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hearts

3W 1D 6L · 12 goals scored · 28 conceded

Tranent

6W 2D 2L · 17 goals scored · 7 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or