Hearts vs Tranent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Hearts vs Tranent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Hearts
Draw
Tranent
Statistical Comparison
3W, 1D, 6L
6W, 2D, 2L
12 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
28 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
-16
+10
1 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 40.4
League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 33.0
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.1
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.49
Attack: 34.0, Defense: 5.7, Form: 25.5
Attack: 45.2, Defense: 61.2, Form: 47.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (35.0 vs 29.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Tranent leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to Hearts's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Defensively, Tranent is far superior, conceding just 0.7 goals per match with 5 clean sheets, while Hearts leaks 2.8 goals per match.
Hearts has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Tranent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Tranent is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.2 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Tranent has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Tranent is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Hearts shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 24.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Tranent. In practical terms, Tranent would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Tranent holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 51.0 against 26.2 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Hearts
Tranent
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Hearts
3W 1D 6L · 12 goals scored · 28 conceded
Tranent
6W 2D 2L · 17 goals scored · 7 conceded
Popular Teams