Skip to content
Compare Jaro vs VPS

Jaro vs VPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Jaro vs VPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Jaro Jaro Home Team
VPS VPS Away Team
Jaro
27.9
W L D L L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

VPS
58.4
W D W W D L W D D W

Performance Radar

Jaro
VPS

Categories Won

2

Jaro

2

Draw

11

VPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

50%

5W, 4D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.7

27 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

+10

+10

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
L. Smyth (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.7

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

45.9

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

1.76

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
27.9

Attack: 36.2, Defense: 9.9, Form: 19.7

58.4

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 70.3, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
4

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

6
2

46-60'

1

61-75'

3
1

76-90+'

4
Jaro
VPS
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 36.2
Defense 9.9
Form 19.7
Consistency 57.7
VPS

Power Rating Breakdown

58.4

Overall

Attack 57.5
Defense 70.3
Form 47.9
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 46.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Jaro logo Jaro
W
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
D
Gnistan (56%)
L
Ilves (51%)
L
HJK (49%)
L
Oulu (54%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
KuPS (67%)
VPS logo VPS
W
Mariehamn (22%)
D
Gnistan (60%)
W
Oulu (49%)
W
SJK (46%)
D
KuPS (62%)
L
TPS (46%)
W
HJK (49%)
D
Lahti (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
46%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
51%
HJK H
2 - 5 L
49%
Oulu A
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
22%
KuPS A
0 - 3 L
67%
Gnistan A
0 - 5 L
60%
Inter Turku A
0 - 2 L
61%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
4 - 0 W
22%
Gnistan A
1 - 1 D
60%
Oulu H
5 - 1 W
49%
SJK A
2 - 1 W
46%
KuPS H
1 - 1 D
62%
TPS A
0 - 1 L
46%
HJK H
2 - 1 W
49%
Lahti A
1 - 1 D
48%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Mariehamn A
1 - 0 W
27%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.7 vs 45.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

VPS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Jaro's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, VPS is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Jaro leaks 2.7 per match.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, VPS is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (57.5), defense (70.3), and form (47.9) leaves little room for doubt. Jaro will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Jaro

Jaro

VS
VPS

VPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Jaro

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 27 conceded

VPS

5W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or