Skip to content
Compare Jaro vs VPS

Jaro vs VPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Jaro vs VPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Jaro Jaro Home Team
VPS VPS Away Team
Jaro
30.8
L L L L W D W L D L

Last 10 Matches

VPS
51.8
W L W L L L W W D W

Performance Radar

Jaro
VPS

Categories Won

1

Jaro

4

Draw

10

VPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
S. Lindholm (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.68

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12

1.51

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.29

Adjusted Power Rating
30.8

Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6

51.8

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 57.5, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

5
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

4

76-90+'

3
Jaro
VPS
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 26.2
Defense 32.7
Form 19.6
Consistency 59.2
VPS

Power Rating Breakdown

51.8

Overall

Attack 57.5
Defense 57.5
Form 47.9
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

50.1 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Jaro logo Jaro
L
Oulu (38%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
VPS (50%)
L
Lahti (59%)
W
SJK (40%)
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
Ilves (44%)
L
TPS (54%)
VPS logo VPS
W
Ilves (49%)
L
TPS (50%)
W
Jaro (38%)
L
Inter Turku (53%)
L
KuPS (48%)
L
HJK (60%)
W
SJK (40%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oulu H
0 - 1 L
38%
HJK A
0 - 3 L
60%
VPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Lahti A
0 - 2 L
59%
SJK H
2 - 1 W
40%
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
44%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
54%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
54%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves A
1 - 0 W
49%
TPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Jaro A
3 - 1 W
38%
Inter Turku H
0 - 1 L
53%
KuPS A
1 - 3 L
48%
HJK A
1 - 2 L
60%
SJK H
1 - 0 W
40%
Mariehamn H
4 - 0 W
29%
Gnistan A
1 - 1 D
58%
Oulu H
5 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (48.1 vs 45.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

VPS's attack is on another level, averaging 1.8 goals per match with S. Lindholm leading the charge (4 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

Defensively, VPS is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Jaro leaks 2.0 goals per match.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: VPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. VPS is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Jaro shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 21.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for VPS. In practical terms, VPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, VPS holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 51.8 against 30.8 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-08), VPS prevailed 1-3 against Jaro. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, VPS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Jaro shows genuine quality and mental strength. Jaro will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. VPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Jaro

Jaro

VS
VPS

VPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Jaro

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded

VPS

5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or