Jaro vs VPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Jaro vs VPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Jaro
Home Team
VPS
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Jaro
Draw
VPS
Statistical Comparison
2W, 2D, 6L
5W, 1D, 4L
8 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
-12
+6
1 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2W / 6 matches
3W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.29
Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6
Attack: 57.5, Defense: 57.5, Form: 47.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Jaro
VPS
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (48.1 vs 45.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
VPS's attack is on another level, averaging 1.8 goals per match with S. Lindholm leading the charge (4 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
Defensively, VPS is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Jaro leaks 2.0 goals per match.
Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: VPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. VPS is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Jaro shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 21.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for VPS. In practical terms, VPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, VPS holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 51.8 against 30.8 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-08), VPS prevailed 1-3 against Jaro. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, VPS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Jaro shows genuine quality and mental strength. Jaro will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. VPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Jaro
VPS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Jaro
2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded
VPS
5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded
Popular Teams