KFUM vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KFUM vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KFUM
Home Team
Napredak
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
KFUM
Draw
Napredak
Statistical Comparison
2W, 3D, 5L
1W, 1D, 8L
10 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
-7
-13
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
0W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.9
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21
Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.03
Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6
Attack: 21.1, Defense: 38.7, Form: 10.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KFUM
Napredak
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.
Napredak has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.5) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means Napredak's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
KFUM holds the attacking edge with 1.0 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.
Both defenses are comparable, with KFUM conceding 1.7 and Napredak conceding 1.9 per match.
Napredak has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.
This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
KFUM
Napredak
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
KFUM
2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded
Napredak
1W 1D 8L · 6 goals scored · 19 conceded
Popular Teams