Skip to content
Compare Kudrivka vs Thun

Kudrivka vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kudrivka vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kudrivka Kudrivka Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Kudrivka
39.8
L W W L D L L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Thun
35.7
D L L L L W L L W W

Performance Radar

Kudrivka
Thun

Categories Won

6

Kudrivka

1

Draw

8

Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Storchous (5 goals)
E. Rastoder (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
67.5

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 72.4

38.6

League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 52.1

Elite Opponent Record
12%

1W / 8 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.22

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.42

1.48

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
39.8

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 58.8, Form: 23.5

35.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 26.6, Form: 26.6

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

3

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

3
Kudrivka
Thun
Kudrivka

Power Rating Breakdown

39.8

Overall

Attack 31.3
Defense 58.8
Form 23.5
Consistency 57.7
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

35.7

Overall

Attack 47.3
Defense 26.6
Form 26.6
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 51.0

Opponent Quality

72.4 vs 52.1

Elite Opponent Record

12% vs 0%
Kudrivka logo Kudrivka
L
Dynamo Kyiv (82%)
W
LNZ Cherkasy (73%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (45%)
L
Kolos (82%)
D
Obolon (61%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
L
Metalist 1925 (80%)
L
Kryvbas KR (72%)
Thun logo Thun
D
St.Gallen (64%)
L
Young Boys (53%)
L
Sion (73%)
L
Basel (44%)
L
Lugano (58%)
W
Basel (39%)
L
Lugano (58%)
L
Zürich (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dynamo Kyiv A
2 - 3 L
82%
LNZ Cherkasy H
1 - 0 W
73%
Rukh Vynnyky H
2 - 1 W
45%
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
82%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
61%
Shakhtar D H
1 - 3 L
78%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 1 L
80%
Kryvbas KR H
1 - 2 L
72%
Epitsentr A
0 - 1 L
72%
Polissya H
0 - 2 L
79%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
St.Gallen A
1 - 1 D
64%
Young Boys H
3 - 8 L
53%
Sion A
0 - 2 L
73%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
44%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
58%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
39%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
58%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
40%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
54%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Kudrivka has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Thun (SoS: 38.6). This means Kudrivka's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Kudrivka's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Kudrivka has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Thun's 2.1.

Kudrivka has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 8 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kudrivka

Kudrivka

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Kudrivka

2W 1D 7L · 8 goals scored · 15 conceded

Thun

3W 1D 6L · 16 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or