Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs VPS

KuPS vs VPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs VPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
VPS VPS Away Team
KuPS
41.8
L D W L D D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

VPS
51.8
W L W L L L W W D W

Performance Radar

KuPS
VPS

Categories Won

2

KuPS

3

Draw

10

VPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Luyeye-Lutumba (3 goals)
S. Lindholm (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.5

League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

1.51

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.29

Adjusted Power Rating
41.8

Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6

51.8

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 57.5, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

5
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

4
1

76-90+'

3
KuPS
VPS
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

41.8

Overall

Attack 39.4
Defense 52.5
Form 29.6
Consistency 53.2
VPS

Power Rating Breakdown

51.8

Overall

Attack 57.5
Defense 57.5
Form 47.9
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

66.7 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
L
Mariehamn (29%)
D
Shamrock (69%)
W
Lahti (59%)
L
U Craiova (70%)
D
TPS (50%)
D
U Craiova (65%)
W
Gnistan (58%)
L
Sabah (85%)
VPS logo VPS
W
Ilves (49%)
L
TPS (50%)
W
Jaro (38%)
L
Inter Turku (53%)
L
KuPS (48%)
L
HJK (60%)
W
SJK (40%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
2 - 4 L
29%
Shamrock A
1 - 1 D
69%
Lahti A
2 - 1 W
59%
U Craiova A
1 - 2 L
70%
TPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
U Craiova H
1 - 1 D
65%
Gnistan A
1 - 0 W
58%
Sabah H
0 - 2 L
85%
VPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sabah A
0 - 1 L
88%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves A
1 - 0 W
49%
TPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Jaro A
3 - 1 W
38%
Inter Turku H
0 - 1 L
53%
KuPS A
1 - 3 L
48%
HJK A
1 - 2 L
60%
SJK H
1 - 0 W
40%
Mariehamn H
4 - 0 W
29%
Gnistan A
1 - 1 D
58%
Oulu H
5 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.5 vs 45.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

VPS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.2, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, KuPS and VPS are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.2 goals per game respectively.

KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: VPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 75% win probability for VPS. In practical terms, VPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward VPS, with a 10.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-25), KuPS prevailed 3-1 against VPS. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. KuPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. VPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KuPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
VPS

VPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded

VPS

5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or