KuPS vs VPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KuPS vs VPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KuPS
Home Team
VPS
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
KuPS
Draw
VPS
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
5W, 1D, 4L
12 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
-2
+6
1 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3
0W / 3 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.29
Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6
Attack: 57.5, Defense: 57.5, Form: 47.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KuPS
VPS
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.5 vs 45.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
VPS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.2, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Defensively, KuPS and VPS are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.2 goals per game respectively.
KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: VPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 10.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 75% win probability for VPS. In practical terms, VPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward VPS, with a 10.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-25), KuPS prevailed 3-1 against VPS. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. KuPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. VPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KuPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
KuPS
VPS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
KuPS
3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded
VPS
5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded
Popular Teams