Paide vs Hegelmann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Paide vs Hegelmann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Paide
Draw
Hegelmann
Statistical Comparison
2W, 2D, 2L
0W, 1D, 1L
7 / 6 matches
1 / 2 matches
8 / 6 matches
4 / 2 matches
-1
-3
2 / 6 matches
0 / 2 matches
2 / 6 matches
1 / 2 matches
3 / 6 matches
1 / 2 matches
2W / 3 matches
0W / 1 matches
0W / 3 matches
0W / 1 matches
League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 78.3
League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 67.5
2W / 6 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.24
Actual: 0.5 | Diff: -0.04
Attack: 46.8, Defense: 66.2, Form: 38.6
Attack: 20.3, Defense: 40.6, Form: 0.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (66.9 vs 71.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Offensively, Paide outperforms Hegelmann with 1.2 goals per match to 0.5, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Paide has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Hegelmann's 2.0.
Paide has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Hegelmann has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 2.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Paide is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 6 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Hegelmann is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 2 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
💡 Why This Matters: The 20.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Paide. In practical terms, Paide would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Paide in this contest. Their superior power rating of 50.2, compared to 30.1 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-16), Paide came out on top with a 3-0 victory over Hegelmann. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Paide secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Paide completely dominated Hegelmann in that encounter, raising serious questions about Hegelmann's ability to compete at this level. Hegelmann will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Paide will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams drew 1-1 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-07-09). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Paide
Hegelmann
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Paide
2W 2D 2L · 7 goals scored · 8 conceded
Hegelmann
0W 1D 1L · 1 goals scored · 4 conceded
Popular Teams