QOTS vs Hamilton Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare QOTS vs Hamilton: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
QOTS
Home Team
Hamilton
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
QOTS
Draw
Hamilton
Statistical Comparison
3W, 5D, 2L
6W, 2D, 2L
18 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
+3
+10
2 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
4W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4
League Difficulty: 43.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.31
Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9
Attack: 66.5, Defense: 60.2, Form: 57.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
QOTS
Hamilton
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 46.4 vs 45.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Hamilton holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus QOTS's 1.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Defensively, Hamilton holds the advantage — allowing just 1.1 goals per game against QOTS's 1.5.
QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Hamilton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Hamilton has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Hamilton has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Hamilton is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while QOTS shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 12.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 81% win probability for Hamilton. In practical terms, Hamilton would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Hamilton has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.4-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
QOTS
Hamilton
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
QOTS
3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Hamilton
6W 2D 2L · 21 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams