Queen's Park vs Partick Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Queen's Park vs Partick: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Queen's Park
Home Team
Partick
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Queen's Park
Draw
Partick
Statistical Comparison
4W, 3D, 3L
3W, 6D, 1L
12 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
+2
+10
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 43.2, Opponent Quality: 50.7
League Difficulty: 54.7, Opponent Quality: 56.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.03
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.05
Attack: 39.1, Defense: 65.1, Form: 39.1
Attack: 61.1, Defense: 61.1, Form: 27.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Queen's Park
Partick
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 47.7 vs 41.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Partick leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.0 goals per game compared to Queen's Park's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Queen's Park giving up 1.0 and Partick giving up 1.0 per fixture.
Queen's Park has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.6 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Queen's Park has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: Queen's Park's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Scottish Championship (2026-05-01). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Queen's Park
Partick
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Queen's Park
4W 3D 3L · 12 goals scored · 10 conceded
Partick
3W 6D 1L · 20 goals scored · 10 conceded
Popular Teams