Skip to content
Compare Radcliffe vs Fylde

Radcliffe vs Fylde Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Radcliffe vs Fylde: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Radcliffe Radcliffe Home Team
Fylde Fylde Away Team
Radcliffe
28.9
D D W L L L L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Fylde
51.6
L W L W W W L W L W

Performance Radar

Radcliffe
Fylde

Categories Won

3

Radcliffe

3

Draw

9

Fylde

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 3D, 6L

60%

6W, 0D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Clegg (6 goals)
L. Thomas (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.2

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 43.3

38.6

League Difficulty: 36.0, Opponent Quality: 40.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.73

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.37

1.77

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.33

Adjusted Power Rating
28.9

Attack: 32.7, Defense: 20.8, Form: 8.9

51.6

Attack: 62.0, Defense: 47.3, Form: 53.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

3
3

46-60'

3
4

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

3
Radcliffe
Fylde
Radcliffe

Power Rating Breakdown

28.9

Overall

Attack 32.7
Defense 20.8
Form 8.9
Consistency 74.8
Fylde

Power Rating Breakdown

51.6

Overall

Attack 62.0
Defense 47.3
Form 53.2
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

33.0 vs 36.0

Opponent Quality

43.3 vs 40.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Radcliffe logo Radcliffe
D
Barrow (40%)
D
Shrewsbury (40%)
W
Macclesfield (39%)
L
Hereford (45%)
L
Kidderminster (67%)
L
South Shields (42%)
L
Fylde (52%)
D
Curzon Ashton (27%)
Fylde logo Fylde
L
Wigan (47%)
W
Longridge Town (43%)
L
Huddersfield (48%)
W
Hyde Utd (41%)
W
Merthyr (35%)
W
Southport (44%)
L
Chester (51%)
W
Radcliffe (25%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barrow H
0 - 0 D
40%
Shrewsbury H
0 - 0 D
40%
Macclesfield H
1 - 0 W
39%
Hereford A
1 - 3 L
45%
Kidderminster H
1 - 3 L
67%
South Shields H
2 - 5 L
42%
Fylde A
3 - 4 L
52%
Curzon Ashton H
3 - 3 D
27%
Worksop A
0 - 2 L
51%
Darlington A
0 - 3 L
30%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Wigan H
0 - 3 L
47%
Longridge Town A
3 - 0 W
43%
Huddersfield H
1 - 2 L
48%
Hyde Utd A
3 - 1 W
41%
Merthyr A
4 - 2 W
35%
Southport H
4 - 0 W
44%
Chester A
0 - 1 L
51%
Radcliffe H
4 - 3 W
25%
Chorley A
0 - 2 L
37%
Marine H
2 - 0 W
32%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 39.2 vs 38.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Fylde's attack is on another level, averaging 2.1 goals per match with L. Thomas leading the charge (5 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Fylde — 1.4 goals conceded per game and 3 clean sheets put them well ahead of Radcliffe, who give up 2.3 goals per match at the other end.

Radcliffe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Fylde has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Fylde is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Radcliffe is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Fylde has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Fylde is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Radcliffe shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Fylde faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Radcliffe can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 22.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Fylde. In practical terms, Fylde would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Fylde holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 51.6 against 28.9 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-06), Fylde prevailed 4-3 against Radcliffe. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Fylde secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 4-3 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Radcliffe will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Fylde will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Radcliffe

Radcliffe

VS
Fylde

Fylde

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Radcliffe

1W 3D 6L · 11 goals scored · 23 conceded

Fylde

6W 0D 4L · 21 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or