Skip to content
Compare Slimbridge vs Cheltenham

Slimbridge vs Cheltenham Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Slimbridge vs Cheltenham: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Slimbridge Slimbridge Home Team
Cheltenham Cheltenham Away Team
Slimbridge
42.6
D W W D L

Last 10 Matches

Cheltenham
39.4
L W L L W W L L L W

Performance Radar

Slimbridge
Cheltenham

Categories Won

5

Slimbridge

8

Draw

2

Cheltenham

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

2W, 2D, 1L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

8 / 5 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

10 / 5 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
20%

1 / 5 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

3 / 5 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

4 / 5 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N/A (0 goals)
G. Miller (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

1W / 2 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.9

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 43.2

43.8

League Difficulty: 42.0, Opponent Quality: 45.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.56

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.04

1.52

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
42.6

Attack: 50.1, Defense: 31.3, Form: 37.6

39.4

Attack: 50.0, Defense: 31.3, Form: 37.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

1

31-45'

1

46-60'

2

61-75'

1

76-90+'

2
Slimbridge
Cheltenham
Slimbridge

Power Rating Breakdown

42.6

Overall

Attack 50.1
Defense 31.3
Form 37.6
Consistency 56.8
Cheltenham

Power Rating Breakdown

39.4

Overall

Attack 50.0
Defense 31.3
Form 37.5
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 42.0

Opponent Quality

43.2 vs 45.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Slimbridge logo Slimbridge
D
MK Irish (48%)
W
Paulton (41%)
W
Burnham (43%)
D
Burnham (44%)
L
Cheltenham (40%)
Cheltenham logo Cheltenham
L
Swindon (39%)
W
Rotherham (38%)
L
Charlton (49%)
L
MK Dons (41%)
W
Slimbridge (49%)
W
Evesham Utd (43%)
L
Colchester (45%)
L
Bristol R (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
MK Irish H
2 - 2 D
48%
Paulton A
2 - 0 W
41%
Burnham H
2 - 1 W
43%
Burnham A
1 - 1 D
44%
Cheltenham H
1 - 6 L
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Swindon A
1 - 2 L
39%
Rotherham H
2 - 1 W
38%
Charlton H
1 - 3 L
49%
MK Dons H
0 - 2 L
41%
Slimbridge A
6 - 1 W
49%
Evesham Utd A
3 - 0 W
43%
Colchester H
1 - 4 L
45%
Bristol R A
0 - 4 L
58%
Tranmere H
1 - 3 L
44%
Newport H
1 - 0 W
44%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 43.9 vs 43.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

The attacking output of Slimbridge and Cheltenham is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.6 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.

Both defenses are comparable, with Slimbridge conceding 2.0 and Cheltenham conceding 2.0 per match.

Slimbridge has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cheltenham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Slimbridge is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Slimbridge faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Cheltenham can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Recent form is the strongest predictor of short-term performance. Cheltenham's current run of 4 wins in 10 matches suggests they are playing at or near their peak capacity right now.

In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-25), Cheltenham prevailed 1-6 against Slimbridge. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Cheltenham achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Slimbridge shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 1-6 scoreline was emphatic — Cheltenham completely dominated Slimbridge in that encounter, raising serious questions about Slimbridge's ability to compete at this level. Slimbridge will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cheltenham will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Slimbridge

Slimbridge

VS
Cheltenham

Cheltenham

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Slimbridge

2W 2D 1L · 8 goals scored · 10 conceded

Cheltenham

4W 0D 6L · 16 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or