Skip to content
Compare Liberec vs KFUM

Liberec vs KFUM Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Liberec vs KFUM: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Liberec Liberec Home Team
KFUM KFUM Away Team
Liberec
36.9
L L L L L W D L W D

Last 10 Matches

KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Performance Radar

Liberec
KFUM

Categories Won

5

Liberec

5

Draw

5

KFUM

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Krollis (3 goals)
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.9

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 54.5

37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.73

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.07

0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
36.9

Attack: 28.2, Defense: 52.9, Form: 21.2

32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

Liberec
KFUM
Liberec

Power Rating Breakdown

36.9

Overall

Attack 28.2
Defense 52.9
Form 21.2
Consistency 59.2
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

54.5 vs 50.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Liberec logo Liberec
L
Jablonec (46%)
L
Sparta Prague (60%)
L
Hradec Kr. (68%)
L
Plzeň (65%)
L
Slavia Prague (63%)
W
Jablonec (46%)
D
Ml. Boleslav (58%)
L
Karviná (47%)
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Jablonec A
1 - 2 L
46%
Sparta Prague H
0 - 2 L
60%
Hradec Kr. A
0 - 1 L
68%
Plzeň A
0 - 2 L
65%
Slavia Prague H
1 - 2 L
63%
Jablonec A
2 - 1 W
46%
Ml. Boleslav H
0 - 0 D
58%
Karviná A
1 - 3 L
47%
Slovácko H
2 - 1 W
37%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Liberec has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.9) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means Liberec's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Liberec averaging 0.8 and KFUM averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Liberec conceding 1.5 and KFUM conceding 1.7 per match.

Liberec has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Liberec

Liberec

VS
KFUM

KFUM

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Liberec

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 15 conceded

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or