South Africa vs Zimbabwe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare South Africa vs Zimbabwe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
South Africa
Home Team
Zimbabwe
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
South Africa
Draw
Zimbabwe
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
4W, 1D, 5L
9 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
-2
-1
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 6 matches
2W / 3 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 60.0
League Difficulty: 67.5, Opponent Quality: 54.7
0W / 2 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.12
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 30.3, Defense: 64.0, Form: 30.3
Attack: 38.4, Defense: 54.5, Form: 38.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
South Africa
Zimbabwe
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.0 vs 46.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
South Africa (0.9 goals per match) and Zimbabwe (1.2 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with South Africa giving up 1.1 and Zimbabwe giving up 1.3 per fixture.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.2 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: South Africa's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
In the CAF Africa Cup of Nations (2025-12-29), South Africa eliminated Zimbabwe with a 2-3 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and South Africa showed they can handle the pressure. Notably, South Africa achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Zimbabwe shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 2-3 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Zimbabwe will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. South Africa will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
South Africa
Zimbabwe
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
South Africa
3W 3D 4L · 9 goals scored · 11 conceded
Zimbabwe
4W 1D 5L · 12 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams