Stenhousemuir vs Peterhead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Stenhousemuir vs Peterhead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Stenhousemuir
Home Team
Peterhead
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Stenhousemuir
Draw
Peterhead
Statistical Comparison
4W, 4D, 2L
2W, 2D, 6L
13 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
+3
-6
3 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 4 matches
0W / 5 matches
3W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 48.3
League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 49.5
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.03
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.14
Attack: 42.9, Defense: 66.0, Form: 39.6
Attack: 25.4, Defense: 50.8, Form: 19.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Stenhousemuir
Peterhead
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 49.0 vs 45.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Stenhousemuir holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Peterhead's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Stenhousemuir's backline outperforms Peterhead's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.4.
Stenhousemuir has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Peterhead has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 2.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Stenhousemuir has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Peterhead is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
💡 Why This Matters: The 14.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Stenhousemuir. In practical terms, Stenhousemuir would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While Stenhousemuir holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 14.9-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Stenhousemuir
Peterhead
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Stenhousemuir
4W 4D 2L · 13 goals scored · 10 conceded
Peterhead
2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams