Worksop vs Curzon Ashton Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Worksop vs Curzon Ashton: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Worksop
Home Team
Curzon Ashton
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Worksop
Draw
Curzon Ashton
Statistical Comparison
5W, 1D, 4L
1W, 4D, 5L
21 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
+9
-11
5 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 40.2
League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 42.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.4
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.16
Attack: 60.3, Defense: 51.7, Form: 43.0
Attack: 29.3, Defense: 26.4, Form: 8.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Worksop
Curzon Ashton
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (36.1 vs 38.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Worksop's attack is on another level, averaging 2.1 goals per match with L. Whitham leading the charge (5 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
Worksop holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.2 goals per game and recording 5 clean sheets, compared to Curzon Ashton's leaky backline that surrenders 2.1 goals per match.
Worksop has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Curzon Ashton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
📈 Form Momentum: Worksop has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Curzon Ashton is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Worksop is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Curzon Ashton shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 20.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Worksop. In practical terms, Worksop would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Worksop in this contest. Their superior power rating of 49.7, compared to 29.4 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Worksop
Curzon Ashton
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Worksop
5W 1D 4L · 21 goals scored · 12 conceded
Curzon Ashton
1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded
Popular Teams