Skip to content
Compare Worksop vs Curzon Ashton

Worksop vs Curzon Ashton Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Worksop vs Curzon Ashton: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Worksop Worksop Home Team
Curzon Ashton Curzon Ashton Away Team
Worksop
49.7
L W W L D W W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Curzon Ashton
29.4
D D L W L D L D L L

Performance Radar

Worksop
Curzon Ashton

Categories Won

10

Worksop

4

Draw

1

Curzon Ashton

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 1D, 4L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+9

+9

-11

-11

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Whitham (5 goals)
T. Weston (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
36.1

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 40.2

38.0

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 42.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.7

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.4

0.84

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
49.7

Attack: 60.3, Defense: 51.7, Form: 43.0

29.4

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 26.4, Form: 8.8

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

1
5

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

4
Worksop
Curzon Ashton
Worksop

Power Rating Breakdown

49.7

Overall

Attack 60.3
Defense 51.7
Form 43.0
Consistency 38.8
Curzon Ashton

Power Rating Breakdown

29.4

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 26.4
Form 8.8
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

40.2 vs 42.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Worksop logo Worksop
L
Chorley (37%)
W
Peterborough S (24%)
W
Spennymoor (45%)
L
Buxton (55%)
D
Alfreton (44%)
W
Radcliffe (25%)
W
Fylde (46%)
L
Marine (37%)
Curzon Ashton logo Curzon Ashton
D
Clitheroe (43%)
D
Alfreton (44%)
L
Buxton (55%)
W
Chorley (37%)
L
Southport (44%)
D
Radcliffe (30%)
L
Chester (46%)
D
King's Lynn (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chorley A
1 - 2 L
37%
Peterborough S H
8 - 0 W
24%
Spennymoor A
1 - 0 W
45%
Buxton H
1 - 2 L
55%
Alfreton A
1 - 1 D
44%
Radcliffe H
2 - 0 W
25%
Fylde H
1 - 0 W
46%
Marine A
2 - 4 L
37%
Bedford A
2 - 0 W
49%
Hereford H
2 - 3 L
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Clitheroe H
1 - 1 D
43%
Alfreton A
3 - 3 D
44%
Buxton H
0 - 4 L
55%
Chorley A
1 - 0 W
37%
Southport H
1 - 3 L
44%
Radcliffe A
3 - 3 D
30%
Chester H
0 - 1 L
46%
King's Lynn A
0 - 0 D
40%
Spennymoor A
1 - 4 L
45%
Macclesfield H
0 - 2 L
39%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (36.1 vs 38.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Worksop's attack is on another level, averaging 2.1 goals per match with L. Whitham leading the charge (5 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

Worksop holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.2 goals per game and recording 5 clean sheets, compared to Curzon Ashton's leaky backline that surrenders 2.1 goals per match.

Worksop has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Curzon Ashton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

📈 Form Momentum: Worksop has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Curzon Ashton is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Worksop is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Curzon Ashton shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 20.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Worksop. In practical terms, Worksop would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Worksop in this contest. Their superior power rating of 49.7, compared to 29.4 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Worksop

Worksop

VS
Curzon Ashton

Curzon Ashton

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Worksop

5W 1D 4L · 21 goals scored · 12 conceded

Curzon Ashton

1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or