Telstar vs NAC Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compará Telstar vs NAC: estadísticas mano a mano, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Telstar
Equipo Local
NAC
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Telstar
Empate
NAC
Comparación Estadística
6V, 1E, 3D
2V, 3E, 5D
21 / 10 partidos
10 / 10 partidos
14 / 10 partidos
20 / 10 partidos
+7
-10
2 / 10 partidos
2 / 10 partidos
8 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
6 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
4V / 5 partidos
1V / 4 partidos
2V / 5 partidos
1V / 6 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 80.0, Calidad del Rival: 58.3
Dificultad de Liga: 73.0, Calidad del Rival: 58.8
1V / 3 partidos
0V / 3 partidos
Real: 2.1 | Dif: -0.27
Real: 1.0 | Dif: -0.23
Ataque: 77.5, Defensa: 59.0, Forma: 66.4
Ataque: 33.3, Defensa: 33.3, Forma: 20.0
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Telstar
NAC
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
Telstar has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 60.7 against considerably stronger competition than NAC (SoS: 49.8). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Few sides can match Telstar in front of goal. Their 2.1 average per fixture tells the story, with S. van Duijn driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.
Telstar's backline outperforms NAC's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.
Telstar has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
NAC has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Telstar has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: Telstar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: NAC is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Telstar is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while NAC shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Telstar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If NAC can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 30.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Telstar. In practical terms, Telstar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Telstar is the clear and dominant favorite. With a power rating of 64.4 vs 33.5, and superior metrics across the board, Telstar should win this comfortably.
In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-02-27), Telstar prevailed 3-0 against NAC. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Telstar secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Telstar completely dominated NAC in that encounter, raising serious questions about NAC's ability to compete at this level. NAC will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Telstar will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Telstar
NAC
En los enfrentamientos H2H (cara a cara), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo ejerce sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen de enfrentamientos directos
Esta comparación cara a cara analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia del rendimiento y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las calificaciones de poder se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles a favor, los goles en contra, el porcentaje de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Telstar
6W 1D 3L · 21 goles a favor · 14 goles en contra
NAC
2W 3D 5L · 10 goles a favor · 20 goles en contra
Equipos Populares