Skip to content
Compare Brann vs HamKam

Brann vs HamKam Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs HamKam: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
HamKam HamKam Away Team
Brann
62.4
D W W L W W L D W W

Last 10 Matches

HamKam
34.1
L D W L L L D D W L

Performance Radar

Brann
HamKam

Categories Won

13

Brann

1

Draw

1

HamKam

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Castro (5 goals)
A. Potur (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.3

League Difficulty: 64.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3

38.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.46

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.26

0.98

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
62.4

Attack: 75.0, Defense: 54.6, Form: 61.4

34.1

Attack: 35.5, Defense: 35.5, Form: 17.8

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

4
5

61-75'

2
7

76-90+'

4
Brann
HamKam
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

62.4

Overall

Attack 75.0
Defense 54.6
Form 61.4
Consistency 52.0
HamKam

Power Rating Breakdown

34.1

Overall

Attack 35.5
Defense 35.5
Form 17.8
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

64.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

58.3 vs 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
D
PAOK (71%)
W
HamKam (40%)
W
Apollon (77%)
L
Apollon (75%)
W
Rosenborg (51%)
W
U Cluj (68%)
L
Vålerenga (45%)
D
U Cluj (70%)
HamKam logo HamKam
L
Brann (64%)
D
Aalesund (44%)
W
Vålerenga (50%)
L
Sarpsborg (57%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (75%)
L
Tromsø (58%)
D
Sandefjord (43%)
D
Aalesund (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PAOK A
1 - 1 D
71%
HamKam H
3 - 0 W
40%
Apollon A
4 - 2 W
77%
Apollon H
0 - 1 L
75%
Rosenborg H
3 - 2 W
51%
U Cluj H
3 - 1 W
68%
Vålerenga H
2 - 3 L
45%
U Cluj A
2 - 2 D
70%
Molde A
2 - 1 W
53%
Start H
2 - 1 W
33%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brann A
0 - 3 L
64%
Aalesund H
1 - 1 D
44%
Vålerenga A
3 - 0 W
50%
Sarpsborg A
0 - 1 L
57%
Bodø/Glimt A
0 - 3 L
75%
Tromsø H
1 - 4 L
58%
Sandefjord A
2 - 2 D
43%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Lillestrøm H
2 - 0 W
42%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 2 L
53%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

Brann has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.3) compared to HamKam (SoS: 38.8). This means Brann's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.

Brann possess a formidable attacking unit, with N. Castro accounting for 5 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.2 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to HamKam's 1.8.

Brann has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 3.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Brann has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: HamKam is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Brann is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while HamKam shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Brann faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If HamKam can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 28.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Brann. In practical terms, Brann would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Brann holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 62.4 against 34.1 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-08-16), Brann prevailed 3-0 against HamKam. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Brann secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Brann completely dominated HamKam in that encounter, raising serious questions about HamKam's ability to compete at this level. HamKam will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Brann will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
HamKam

HamKam

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Brann

6W 2D 2L · 22 goals scored · 14 conceded

HamKam

2W 3D 5L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or