Brann vs HamKam Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Brann vs HamKam: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Brann
Home Team
HamKam
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Brann
Draw
HamKam
Statistical Comparison
6W, 2D, 2L
2W, 3D, 5L
22 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
+8
-6
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4W / 6 matches
1W / 3 matches
2W / 4 matches
1W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 64.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6
1W / 4 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.26
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.22
Attack: 75.0, Defense: 54.6, Form: 61.4
Attack: 35.5, Defense: 35.5, Form: 17.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Brann
HamKam
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
Brann has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.3) compared to HamKam (SoS: 38.8). This means Brann's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Brann possess a formidable attacking unit, with N. Castro accounting for 5 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.2 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.
Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to HamKam's 1.8.
Brann has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Statistical modeling projects 3.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Brann has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: HamKam is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Brann is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while HamKam shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Brann faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If HamKam can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 28.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Brann. In practical terms, Brann would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Brann holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 62.4 against 34.1 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-08-16), Brann prevailed 3-0 against HamKam. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Brann secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Brann completely dominated HamKam in that encounter, raising serious questions about HamKam's ability to compete at this level. HamKam will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Brann will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Brann
HamKam
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Brann
6W 2D 2L · 22 goals scored · 14 conceded
HamKam
2W 3D 5L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded
Popular Teams