Skip to content
Compare Chelmsford vs Dag & Red

Chelmsford vs Dag & Red Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chelmsford vs Dag & Red: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chelmsford Chelmsford Home Team
Dag & Red Dag & Red Away Team
Chelmsford
41.2
L W D D D W D W L L

Last 10 Matches

Dag & Red
39.8
W L D L D L W W W D

Performance Radar

Chelmsford
Dag & Red

Categories Won

7

Chelmsford

4

Draw

4

Dag & Red

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Taylor (4 goals)
A. Oteh (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.9

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 39.9

38.8

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 43.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.57

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.23

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
41.2

Attack: 51.5, Defense: 37.2, Form: 25.8

39.8

Attack: 47.4, Defense: 29.6, Form: 35.5

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

6
2

61-75'

1
7

76-90+'

1
Chelmsford
Dag & Red
Chelmsford

Power Rating Breakdown

41.2

Overall

Attack 51.5
Defense 37.2
Form 25.8
Consistency 57.7
Dag & Red

Power Rating Breakdown

39.8

Overall

Attack 47.4
Defense 29.6
Form 35.5
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

39.9 vs 43.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chelmsford logo Chelmsford
L
Eastbourne (24%)
W
Chesham (48%)
D
Hornchurch (58%)
D
Maidenhead (43%)
D
Dag & Red (44%)
W
Enfield T (33%)
D
Totton (38%)
W
Chippenham (43%)
Dag & Red logo Dag & Red
W
Hashtag Utd (43%)
L
Slough (26%)
D
Weston-s-Mare (36%)
L
Worthing (60%)
D
Chelmsford (40%)
L
Hornchurch (58%)
W
Hampton & RB (39%)
W
Torquay (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Eastbourne H
1 - 3 L
24%
Chesham A
2 - 0 W
48%
Hornchurch A
3 - 3 D
58%
Maidenhead H
1 - 1 D
43%
Dag & Red A
3 - 3 D
44%
Enfield T H
3 - 0 W
33%
Totton H
1 - 1 D
38%
Chippenham A
1 - 0 W
43%
Farnborough A
2 - 4 L
48%
Dover H
1 - 2 L
20%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hashtag Utd A
2 - 1 W
43%
Slough A
2 - 3 L
26%
Weston-s-Mare H
0 - 0 D
36%
Worthing A
2 - 7 L
60%
Chelmsford H
3 - 3 D
40%
Hornchurch A
0 - 3 L
58%
Hampton & RB H
3 - 1 W
39%
Torquay H
1 - 0 W
48%
Farnborough A
3 - 2 W
48%
Enfield T A
0 - 0 D
38%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (35.9 vs 38.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

The attacking output of Chelmsford and Dag & Red is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.8 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Chelmsford holds the advantage — allowing just 1.7 goals per game against Dag & Red's 2.0.

Chelmsford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Dag & Red has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Dag & Red has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Dag & Red's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

These two teams drew 3-3 in the National League N / S (2026-04-06). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chelmsford

Chelmsford

VS
Dag & Red

Dag & Red

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chelmsford

3W 4D 3L · 18 goals scored · 17 conceded

Dag & Red

4W 3D 3L · 16 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or