Cliftonville vs Glenavon Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Cliftonville vs Glenavon: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Cliftonville
Home Team
Glenavon
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Cliftonville
Draw
Glenavon
Statistical Comparison
7W, 0D, 3L
1W, 4D, 5L
16 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
+8
-9
4 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5W / 7 matches
0W / 6 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 43.2, Opponent Quality: 48.1
League Difficulty: 42.9, Opponent Quality: 50.9
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.1
Attack: 51.3, Defense: 70.5, Form: 67.3
Attack: 26.1, Defense: 42.3, Form: 9.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Cliftonville
Glenavon
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 46.1 vs 47.7), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Cliftonville holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Glenavon's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Cliftonville — 0.8 goals conceded per game and 4 clean sheets put them well ahead of Glenavon, who give up 1.7 goals per match at the other end.
Cliftonville has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Glenavon has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Cliftonville is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
🔥 Form Momentum: Cliftonville is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 16 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
❄️ Form Momentum: Glenavon is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Cliftonville is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Glenavon shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 27.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Cliftonville. In practical terms, Cliftonville would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Cliftonville holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 59.7 against 32.7 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Cliftonville
Glenavon
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Cliftonville
7W 0D 3L · 16 goals scored · 8 conceded
Glenavon
1W 4D 5L · 8 goals scored · 17 conceded
Popular Teams