Skip to content
Compare C Palace vs Spurs

C Palace vs Spurs Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare C Palace vs Spurs: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

C Palace C Palace Home Team
Spurs Spurs Away Team
C Palace
46.1
L W W L W W L D L D

Last 10 Matches

Spurs
51.1
L D W D W D W W W L

Performance Radar

C Palace
Spurs

Categories Won

6

C Palace

2

Draw

7

Spurs

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Mateta (3 goals)
Richarlison (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.4

League Difficulty: 74.8, Opponent Quality: 61.4

44.4

League Difficulty: 60.9, Opponent Quality: 57.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.63

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.03

1.46

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
46.1

Attack: 54.1, Defense: 43.9, Form: 40.6

51.1

Attack: 44.1, Defense: 62.9, Form: 47.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

2
C Palace
Spurs
C Palace

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 54.1
Defense 43.9
Form 40.6
Consistency 44.8
Spurs

Power Rating Breakdown

51.1

Overall

Attack 44.1
Defense 62.9
Form 47.2
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

74.8 vs 60.9

Opponent Quality

61.4 vs 57.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
C Palace logo C Palace
L
Everton (73%)
W
Fulham (48%)
W
Ula (43%)
L
Bromley (48%)
W
Swindon (36%)
W
Rayo (56%)
L
Arsenal (78%)
D
Brentford (81%)
Spurs logo Spurs
L
Brentford (81%)
D
Hoffenheim (55%)
W
Hoffenheim (55%)
D
Getafe (50%)
W
Chelsea (53%)
D
Sydney (46%)
W
Auckland (49%)
W
MK Dons (41%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Everton A
0 - 2 L
73%
Fulham A
2 - 1 W
48%
Ula H
3 - 1 W
43%
Bromley A
0 - 3 L
48%
Swindon H
5 - 1 W
36%
Rayo H
1 - 0 W
56%
Arsenal H
1 - 2 L
78%
Brentford A
2 - 2 D
81%
Man City A
0 - 3 L
83%
Everton H
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brentford A
0 - 3 L
81%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 2 D
55%
Hoffenheim H
3 - 0 W
55%
Getafe H
1 - 1 D
50%
Chelsea A
2 - 1 W
53%
Sydney H
1 - 1 D
46%
Auckland A
2 - 0 W
49%
MK Dons H
1 - 0 W
41%
Everton H
1 - 0 W
68%
Chelsea A
1 - 2 L
74%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (51.4 vs 44.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with C Palace averaging 1.6 and Spurs averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Defensively, Spurs holds the advantage — allowing just 1.0 goals per game against C Palace's 1.7.

C Palace has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Spurs has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 62% win probability for Spurs. In practical terms, Spurs would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

While Spurs holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 5.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

C Palace

C Palace

VS
Spurs

Spurs

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

C Palace

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 17 conceded

Spurs

5W 3D 2L · 14 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or