Dender vs Lommel Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Dender vs Lommel: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Dender
Home Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Dender
Draw
Lommel
Statistical Comparison
2W, 1D, 7L
1W, 1D, 2L
10 / 10 matches
4 / 4 matches
19 / 10 matches
11 / 4 matches
-9
-7
2 / 10 matches
1 / 4 matches
7 / 10 matches
3 / 4 matches
7 / 10 matches
2 / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 2 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 2 matches
League Difficulty: 56.6, Opponent Quality: 52.1
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 40.2
0W / 2 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.05
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.26
Attack: 30.3, Defense: 33.3, Form: 18.2
Attack: 30.7, Defense: 6.1, Form: 23.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Dender
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.9 vs 42.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Dender (1.0 goals per match) and Lommel (1.0 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Dender holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.9 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to Lommel's leaky backline that surrenders 2.8 goals per match.
Lommel has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Dender is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Lommel is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Dender faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.9 goals per match. If Lommel can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for Dender. In practical terms, Dender would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Dender, with a 5.6-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 0-0 in the Belgian Play-offs 1/2 (2026-05-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. In their recent Belgian Play-offs 1/2 match (2026-05-17), Lommel prevailed 3-2 against Dender. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Lommel secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Dender will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Lommel will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Dender
Lommel
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Dender
2W 1D 7L · 10 goals scored · 19 conceded
Lommel
1W 1D 2L · 4 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams