Dender vs Lommel Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compara Dender vs Lommel: estadísticas cara a cara, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Dender
Equipo Local
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Dender
Empate
Lommel
Comparación Estadística
2V, 1E, 7D
1V, 1E, 2D
10 / 10 partidos
4 / 4 partidos
19 / 10 partidos
11 / 4 partidos
-9
-7
2 / 10 partidos
1 / 4 partidos
7 / 10 partidos
3 / 4 partidos
7 / 10 partidos
2 / 4 partidos
1V / 5 partidos
1V / 2 partidos
1V / 5 partidos
0V / 2 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 56.6, Calidad del Rival: 52.1
Dificultad de Liga: 45.0, Calidad del Rival: 40.2
0V / 2 partidos
0V / 0 partidos
Real: 1.0 | Dif: +0.05
Real: 1.0 | Dif: +0.26
Ataque: 30.3, Defensa: 33.3, Forma: 18.2
Ataque: 30.7, Defensa: 6.1, Forma: 23.0
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Dender
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.9 vs 42.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Dender (1.0 goals per match) and Lommel (1.0 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Dender holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.9 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to Lommel's leaky backline that surrenders 2.8 goals per match.
Lommel has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Dender is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Lommel is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Dender faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.9 goals per match. If Lommel can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for Dender. In practical terms, Dender would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Dender, with a 5.6-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 0-0 in the Belgian Play-offs 1/2 (2026-05-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. In their recent Belgian Play-offs 1/2 match (2026-05-17), Lommel prevailed 3-2 against Dender. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Lommel secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Dender will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Lommel will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Dender
Lommel
En los enfrentamientos H2H (duelos directos), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo impone sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen comparativo
Esta comparación de enfrentamientos directos analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia en la forma y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las valoraciones de potencia se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles marcados, los goles en contra, la tasa de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Dender
2W 1D 7L · 10 goles marcados · 19 goles en contra
Lommel
1W 1D 2L · 4 goles marcados · 11 goles en contra
Equipos Populares