Skip to content
Compare KÍ vs Atert

KÍ vs Atert Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KÍ vs Atert: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KÍ Home Team
Atert Atert Away Team
42.7
D L L L D W W

Last 10 Matches

Atert
36.6
D D L W L L

Performance Radar

Atert

Categories Won

7

2

Draw

6

Atert

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
29%

2W, 2D, 3L

17%

1W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.6

4 / 7 matches

1.3

8 / 6 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

9 / 7 matches

2.0

12 / 6 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
29%

2 / 7 matches

17%

1 / 6 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
43%

3 / 7 matches

50%

3 / 6 matches

Both Teams to Score
29%

2 / 7 matches

83%

5 / 6 matches

Top Scorer
P. Klettskarð (2 goals)
R. Ferber (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
70.3

League Difficulty: 90.9, Opponent Quality: 76.3

51.2

League Difficulty: 73.3, Opponent Quality: 62.5

Elite Opponent Record
29%

2W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.62

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: -0.05

1.56

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
42.7

Attack: 24.1, Defense: 68.2, Form: 34.9

36.6

Attack: 43.9, Defense: 33.7, Form: 17.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

16-30'

3

31-45'

2

46-60'

1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

Atert
KÍ

Power Rating Breakdown

42.7

Overall

Attack 24.1
Defense 68.2
Form 34.9
Consistency 53.5
Atert

Power Rating Breakdown

36.6

Overall

Attack 43.9
Defense 33.7
Form 17.2
Consistency 65.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

90.9 vs 73.3

Opponent Quality

76.3 vs 62.5

Elite Opponent Record

29% vs 0%
KÍ logo
D
Riga (72%)
L
Lech (82%)
L
Lech (87%)
L
Kauno Žalgiris (74%)
D
Kauno Žalgiris (70%)
W
Atert (76%)
W
Atert (73%)
Atert logo Atert
D
Győr (69%)
D
Liège (52%)
L
Győr (66%)
W
Virton (42%)
L
KÍ (71%)
L
KÍ (75%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Riga H
0 - 0 D
72%
Lech H
0 - 5 L
82%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
87%
Kauno Žalgiris A
0 - 1 L
74%
Kauno Žalgiris H
0 - 0 D
70%
Atert A
2 - 1 W
76%
Atert H
2 - 1 W
73%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Győr A
1 - 1 D
69%
Liège H
1 - 1 D
52%
Győr H
2 - 6 L
66%
Virton H
2 - 0 W
42%
H
1 - 2 L
71%
A
1 - 2 L
75%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

KÍ has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 70.3) compared to Atert (SoS: 51.2). This means KÍ's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.

Atert leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.3 goals per game compared to KÍ's 0.6 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

KÍ's backline outperforms Atert's, with 1.3 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.

KÍ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.6 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: KÍ is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 7 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Atert is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 6 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for KÍ. In practical terms, KÍ would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While KÍ holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 6.1-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams met recently in the UEFA Champions League (2026-07-15): KÍ defeated Atert 1-2. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates KÍ's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Atert. Notably, KÍ achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Atert shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Atert will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KÍ will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams met recently in the UEFA Champions League (2026-07-07): KÍ defeated Atert 2-1. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates KÍ's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Atert. KÍ secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Atert will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KÍ will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KÍ

VS
Atert

Atert

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

2W 2D 3L · 4 goals scored · 9 conceded

Atert

1W 2D 3L · 8 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or