KuPS vs TPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KuPS vs TPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KuPS
Home Team
TPS
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
KuPS
Draw
TPS
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
4W, 3D, 3L
12 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
-2
+4
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3
0W / 3 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.17
Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6
Attack: 47.9, Defense: 60.7, Form: 38.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KuPS
TPS
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.5 vs 45.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, TPS outperforms KuPS with 1.5 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Defensively, KuPS and TPS are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.1 goals per game respectively.
KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: TPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 6.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 67% win probability for TPS. In practical terms, TPS would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
TPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.8-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Finnish Veikkausliiga (2026-08-09). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
KuPS
TPS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
KuPS
3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded
TPS
4W 3D 3L · 15 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams